Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 44 results by wyzdic
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: SRBMiner-MULTI CPU & AMD GPU Miner 0.1.8 beta
by
wyzdic
on 03/12/2019, 07:31:50 UTC
EPYC 7601*2 auto set only 8K hashrate Huh
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [JCE]Fast & stable CN/v8/Heavy/Tube/XHV miner, CPU+GPU, Vega56 1800+ RX580 1200+
by
wyzdic
on 01/12/2019, 14:16:03 UTC
We need JCE
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.3.8 - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 25/12/2018, 00:39:17 UTC
Just a small update on how my small farm is doing, I been running this miner for a week now pretty stable with almost no issues. Not sure how I can check for the percentage of rejected and accepted shares, but all the numbers seem to have evened out. All my miners have been running almost all the same across the board. Maybe a few points of difference between them but they can all hit at least 1900 sol/s for my vega 56's.

A few days ago I read a reddit post of a dude saying he was able to hit 2000 sol/s on his vega 56 with an extremely reduced power draw. He was using the recently released adrenalin drivers but didn't give out much more information. So far I have downloaded the second to latest drivers and have been able to closely replicate the results i had with using the soft powerplay table mod and using overdriveN tool. It does feel like there is room for fine tuning but i wouldn't know where to start. Ideally I would like to hit the 2000 sol/s using 115w on gpu-z. Maybe not that low but having a system total power draw of 500w or under for 3 vega 56 would be very nice.



Haha - "sol/s"...  someone's been mining ZEC? Wink

I have mostly 64s, but my one 56 is running around 1950 H/s at sub-160W ATW.  It doesn't seem to be the best asic quality, and is a bit old, so I would expect better from a larger sample set.  I also flashed to 64 rom a while ago, which is useless for CNv2 (unless you don't care about power use,) so even lower power use should be expected on a stock rom given that 56 mem runs at a lower voltage, while it's tighter mem timings allow similar results at lower clocks.

For 2K H/s (and best efficiency,) I would suggest a voltage setting of around 840mv (or less if you can get away w/ it,) while targeting a 1400 effective core clock.  I say effective, because the low voltage will almost certainly cause significant core clock throttling, so you will likely have to set your P7 clock much higher than 1400 to get to that level while under a mining load.  For example, I run a 1450 @ 835mv P7 setting, and only get a ~1360 effective clock out of it.  On some of my 64s, my clock setting ranges from 1430-1500 (@ 815-850mv) to get to ~1400 effective.  As for mem clock, I believe you're looking for a ~950Mhz setting for a 56 - higher is obviously better, if possible.

Regarding the PPT, it really is only necessary for two reasons.  The first is to lower your P0-5 power state voltages to allow undervolting P6/7 appropriately.  This is necessary via PPT, because P0-5 can't be set w/ ODNT/Wattman/etc, but power state voltage settings must be in ascending order.  In other words, w/o PPT, the floor for P6/7 voltage is whatever the stock P5 voltage is set to - around 1.1v iirc.  With that in mind, I set my P0-P5 @ 800-805mv via PPT, then tune P7 (while miner is running) as appropriate via ODNT. 1450 @ 840mv is prob a good P7 starting point while tuning.

The second purpose of PPT is to lock in your final settings once you're done tuning, as it seems the drivers don't seem to always honor the ODNT voltage settings on load, but if those same settings are written to PPT, they 'stick'.  This also technically removes the need for loading ODNT profiles at startup, though it doesn't hurt anything to continue to do so.

So in short, your steps are:

  1. Create a first PPT simply to drop your voltage floor
  2. Tune while miner is running to get to an appropriate/stable P7
  3. Recreate PPT using final P6/7 values

A couple other notes:

 - a cn_config setting (for trm) of 15+15 seems to be better than 16+14, at least for these lower clocks

 - CNv2, esp w/ the TRM rocketship, is an unstable beast power wise.  Settings which may seem stable at first (even for hours,) may lead to a crash at some point due to power starvation.  Even once you think you've found the correct settings, expect to have to dial voltages up (or clocks down) by increments of 5-10 over time to get to a truly stable setup.

 - You can create PPTs via ODNT, by running in admin mode, then clicking on the GPU icon (top left) and selecting 'PPTable Editor'.

 - As a starting point, here is my ODNT profile for my 56, though every card, properly tuned, will have different P7 values (also note my mem clock setting is for a 64 bios):

Code:
[Profile_66]
Name=cn8-srvega56-s-r1-2
GPU_P0=852;800
GPU_P1=991;801
GPU_P2=1084;802
GPU_P3=1100;803
GPU_P4=1125;804
GPU_P5=1150;805
GPU_P6=1350;815
GPU_P7=1450;835
Mem_P0=167;800
Mem_P1=500;800
Mem_P2=800;802
Mem_P3=1107;830
Fan_Min=300
Fan_Max=4000
Fan_Target=50
Fan_Acoustic=0
Power_Temp=80
Power_Target=0


EDIT: I always run latest drivers - never had a problem w/ them other than when using stak/derivatives (TRM is an entirely separate codebase, so doesn't suffer from the same issues.)  It should be noted that the latest Adrenaline drivers allow setting P0-5 now, which should remove the need for PPT.  Sadly, based on my testing it would seem they forgot to extend this capability to the mem power states, which also act as voltage floors to the core.


NICE TUTORIAL.

i have vega 56 with 64 bios. Are you sure that V8 algo is better to return stock bios? i have referent vega 56 with samsung mem and now i  u se 1095/1100 mhz mem

Do not flash to 64, It only increases your power consumption.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Cast XMR does not recognize last video card
by
wyzdic
on 06/11/2018, 04:05:26 UTC
Why not reply in the cast-xmr thread?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 05/11/2018, 15:49:18 UTC
A great miner from my perspective, tried it on 6 x RX Vega 56 flashed as 64, all of them managed to reached 2000+ some 2180. which is considerable improvement over anything else.
Stable so far.

Can you provide the frequency and power of the card?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 02/11/2018, 03:28:33 UTC
0.3.6 version feedback
Vega56 1448/950 0.875 2050 h/s 168w/card at wall
Vega64 1448/1100 0.875 2150 h/s 200w/card at wall
Rx550 1350/1905 480 h/s
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 01/11/2018, 16:41:58 UTC
I'm going to run it on my 6xVega rig for a while.
It's on a riserless Onda D1800 board sporting a very shitty CPU so if there are any bottlenecks, I guess I'll see them happening.

At the moment it's chugging along at 12.2kh/s with less than 20% CPU usage.

Push up your core frequency, you will get 2150h/s at 1448/1100. If you have a higher core frequency, you will get more
No way!!
Is that so??
Who'dve thunk!


On a more serious note, no.
I have a 1500W gold rated PSU and sitting at 1275 at the wall currently so I'm happy where I am. But by all means, crank it up, dude!

1408-1448 is a very conservative number, I don't need to increase the voltage value on my rig, so your power consumption will not increase.
My 5 Vega64 rig at 1010 at the wall and have 10.7-10.8K
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 01/11/2018, 15:37:44 UTC
I'm going to run it on my 6xVega rig for a while.
It's on a riserless Onda D1800 board sporting a very shitty CPU so if there are any bottlenecks, I guess I'll see them happening.

At the moment it's chugging along at 12.2kh/s with less than 20% CPU usage.

Push up your core frequency, you will get 2150h/s at 1448/1100. If you have a higher core frequency, you will get more
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 01/11/2018, 15:33:01 UTC
I am very happy to participate in the new version of the test, I have 8x vega56 rigs, win10 LTSB, celeron CPU, cer in the 0.34 and 0.35 versions, the rig always crashes between 40 minutes and 2 hours, the same parameters use xmr-stak or The SRB is operating normally.
In the test version, the same parameters, 1407/950, did not crash for 11 hours of normal operation, and had the hashrate (16.1K) closest to v7 and the power consumption closest to v7.

Code:
Elapsed MHS av MHS 30s KHS av KHS 30s Found Blocks Getworks Accepted Rejected Hardware Errors
SUMMARY 11h 11m 38s 0.0161 0.01611 16.1 16.11 0 362 1,563 0 0
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 01/11/2018, 02:12:18 UTC
I just wanted to confirm that version 0.3.5 works for initialization of all cards, even with my turbo-disabled super slow celeron 3885U.

The performance gain is huge, however during the night half of my rigs hanged or crashed, even if I use lower settings than JCE or SRBminer. This miner taps into parts of Vega that are normaly not touched by slower miners, so it will take some time to tune the rigs properly.

keep up with development, thanks


Me too.
I increase the voltage and reduce the memory frequency, but the mine crash will still crash in about 2 hours. This happens on my Vega56 mine and the vega64 mine is running normally.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 31/10/2018, 05:51:04 UTC
Dear, please add the option --bus-order, as in JCE, SRB. Very useful for simply identifying problem cards in rigs with a large number of video cards.


When the miner starts, you can see the PCIE ID, open your device manager, find the VEGA card, and you can see the same PCIE ID.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 31/10/2018, 01:20:37 UTC

Only 6 for "... Successfully initialized GPU X".


That’s actually a good thing from my perspective, it points to the init phase not working properly, not the core mining process.

I have a build available very shortly. Are you available for a quick test? I’d love to see if this solves your issue before we push it as an official release.

Anyone else available right now that has had the some-subset-of-my-gpus-don’t-work issue and are willing to test a patch, reach out to me over PM or find me on Discord (Zcoin/fpga/mineority/lux/cryptobridge are some servers I’m available on).

Yes, I have enough time to test now.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 31/10/2018, 00:32:35 UTC
I can’t get more than 5 of my VEGA 56 to hash at the same time, currently running rigs with 8 x Vega 56

Celeron processor
Ubuntu mate 18.04
Amdgpupro 18.30

The miner initializes all 8 cards, all 8 cards show full activity on LEDs, but always 0 hashrate reported for 3 of them, only 5 ever have a hash rate above 0

Any ideas?

Well, there is some issue here that multiple users have been seeing. Not at all certain it's the reason, but Celeron CPUs and many gpus seem to be the common data point so far. On startup, can you confirm you see the output line "... Successfully initialized GPU X" for all gpus, or is it only for five of them, i.e. the ones that then hash successfully?



Only 6 for "... Successfully initialized GPU X".
Like this.

Code:
[2018-10-31 08:00:45] Successfully initialized GPU 0: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 16:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:45] Successfully initialized GPU 1: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 10:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:46] Successfully initialized GPU 2: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 03:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:47] Successfully initialized GPU 3: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 19:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:48] Successfully initialized GPU 4: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 07:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:49] Successfully initialized GPU 5: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 22:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:49] API initialized on 127.0.0.1:9755
[2018-10-31 08:00:49] Pool xxxxx login succeeded.
[2018-10-31 08:00:49] Pool xxxxx received new job. (job_id: 979590065579534250)
[2018-10-31 08:00:49] Pool xxxxx set difficulty to 600023
[2018-10-31 08:00:51] Dev pool connected and ready.
[2018-10-31 08:01:08] Pool xxxxx received new job. (job_id: 173340078480066250)
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 0 - cnv8: 1.756kh/s, avg 1.499kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 1 - cnv8: 1.668kh/s, avg 1.424kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 2 - cnv8: 1.596kh/s, avg 1.405kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 3 - cnv8: 1.597kh/s, avg 1.445kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 4 - cnv8: 1.651kh/s, avg 1.543kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 5 - cnv8: 1.793kh/s, avg 1.722kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 6 - cnv8:   0.0 h/s, avg   0.0 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 7 - cnv8:   0.0 h/s, avg   0.0 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats Total - cnv8: 10.06kh/s, avg 9.037kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 30/10/2018, 17:45:46 UTC

Win10 LTSB. 18.6.1, 8x Vega56.
It's not random, it's GPU 6 and GPU7 every time, and it doesn't show GPU6 and GPU7 at startup, it can be seen in the thread. Using -d 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7, the problem remains


If you start with -d 2,3,4,5,6,7, then -d 2,3,4,5,6,7,0,1, what happens? I'm curious if it's always the last two cards in the provided device order that are failing or if it's always your GPU6/7 in the OpenCL enumeration...



I restarted the miner 20+ times. Now GPU6 starts working, but GPU7 still doesn't work. I think this is because of the CPU problem?

ps:GPU6 doesn't work when I turn off the miner to reopen

ps2:I tested using -d 0,1,2,3,4, gpu3 and gpu4 didn't work. Cry
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 30/10/2018, 17:02:53 UTC

Whenever the vards initialize or not, the miner works super nice from what I have seen so far. I am busy all day optimizing my rigs for this miner. If some cards don't initialize, miner still works, just displays 0h/s for that card, and CPU usage is high, so he is probably stuck trying to initialize the cards or something.
Then, i just quit the miner and try few times and eventually all cards initialize.

Yes, me too.

For vmozara's problem, I'm 97% certain this issue would be solved with a staggered init. These Celerons are just too weak for a parallel init for > 2-3 GPUs or something. I'll add some more options now to control the behavior at startup, then send you a PM. Need to wait for todxx to provide a new build, but it would be nice to connect and do a few verification runs instead of just pushing a new version out there not knowing if it actually solves the problem.

@wyzdic, are you having the same issue as vmozara? It feels like we might have a different problem, do you get a random nr of gpus going or always the first six? Furthermore, I've heard about people that have issues in general getting > 6 Vegas going under Linux, are you on Win or some Linux version?

Win10 LTSB. 18.6.1, 8x Vega56.
It's not random, it's GPU 6 and GPU7 every time, and it doesn't show GPU6 and GPU7 at startup, it can be seen in the thread. Using -d 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7, the problem remains

Code:
[2018-10-31 08:00:45] Successfully initialized GPU 0: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 16:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:45] Successfully initialized GPU 1: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 10:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:46] Successfully initialized GPU 2: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 03:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:47] Successfully initialized GPU 3: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 19:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:48] Successfully initialized GPU 4: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 07:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:49] Successfully initialized GPU 5: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 22:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 08:00:49] API initialized on 127.0.0.1:9755
[2018-10-31 08:00:49] Pool xxxxx login succeeded.
[2018-10-31 08:00:49] Pool xxxxx received new job. (job_id: 979590065579534250)
[2018-10-31 08:00:49] Pool xxxxx set difficulty to 600023
[2018-10-31 08:00:51] Dev pool connected and ready.
[2018-10-31 08:01:08] Pool xxxxx received new job. (job_id: 173340078480066250)
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 0 - cnv8: 1.756kh/s, avg 1.499kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 1 - cnv8: 1.668kh/s, avg 1.424kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 2 - cnv8: 1.596kh/s, avg 1.405kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 3 - cnv8: 1.597kh/s, avg 1.445kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 4 - cnv8: 1.651kh/s, avg 1.543kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 5 - cnv8: 1.793kh/s, avg 1.722kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 6 - cnv8:   0.0 h/s, avg   0.0 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats GPU 7 - cnv8:   0.0 h/s, avg   0.0 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 08:01:19] Stats Total - cnv8: 10.06kh/s, avg 9.037kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 30/10/2018, 16:38:45 UTC
Guys,

I need help.


My mining rigs are riserless motherboards with 7x vega.

These boards have Celeron 3885 CPU that appears to be very slow.

When the miner starts, it in parallel initializes each card and connects to the pool. But once the shares start coming, the CPU is busy with something (probably verifying the found shares?) and never completes initialization of some cards. Sometimes 3 cards start, sometimes 6 cards start, sometimes all 7. But I have to manually stop and start the miner many times until I get lucky and initialize all 7 cards.

Is it possible to introduce some delay between card initialization and mining start, or disable CPU share verification?


Thanks!




Will be back at my desk shortly and will provide better feedback. Meanwhile, can you describe the behavior those times you’re lucky and all cards initialize ok, does mining work fine after that in those cases?

I think we need to add an option of doing a staggered initialization and a delay, that no card starts mining before the full init process has completed.

The miner is actually missing on-cpu verification, we didn’t have time to add it, so that’s not the issue at least Smiley.

Whenever the vards initialize or not, the miner works super nice from what I have seen so far. I am busy all day optimizing my rigs for this miner. If some cards don't initialize, miner still works, just displays 0h/s for that card, and CPU usage is high, so he is probably stuck trying to initialize the cards or something.
Then, i just quit the miner and try few times and eventually all cards initialize.

Yes, me too.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner - CNv8 - Vega 64 2200+h/s Rx470 1025+h/s Low Power Draw
by
wyzdic
on 30/10/2018, 16:28:46 UTC
Guys,

I need help.


My mining rigs are riserless motherboards with 7x vega.

These boards have Celeron 3885 CPU that appears to be very slow.

When the miner starts, it in parallel initializes each card and connects to the pool. But once the shares start coming, the CPU is busy with something (probably verifying the found shares?) and never completes initialization of some cards. Sometimes 3 cards start, sometimes 6 cards start, sometimes all 7. But I have to manually stop and start the miner many times until I get lucky and initialize all 7 cards.

Is it possible to introduce some delay between card initialization and mining start, or disable CPU share verification?


Thanks!



Will be back at my desk shortly and will provide better feedback. Meanwhile, can you describe the behavior those times you’re lucky and all cards initialize ok, does mining work fine after that in those cases?

I think we need to add an option of doing a staggered initialization and a delay, that no card starts mining before the full init process has completed.

The miner is actually missing on-cpu verification, we didn’t have time to add it, so that’s not the issue at least Smiley.

I have 8 vegas and celeron 847, No matter how many times restart, can only start 6 cards.  Cry

Code:
[2018-10-31 00:23:07] Successfully initialized GPU 0: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 16:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 00:23:08] Successfully initialized GPU 1: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 10:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 00:23:09] Successfully initialized GPU 2: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 03:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 00:23:10] Successfully initialized GPU 3: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 19:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 00:23:11] Successfully initialized GPU 4: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 07:00.0) (CN 16+14)
[2018-10-31 00:23:11] Successfully initialized GPU 5: Vega with 56 CU (PCIe 22:00.0) (CN 16+14)

[2018-10-31 00:23:42] Stats GPU 0 - cnv8: 1.664kh/s, avg 1.387kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 00:23:42] Stats GPU 1 - cnv8: 1.680kh/s, avg 1.423kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 00:23:42] Stats GPU 2 - cnv8: 1.661kh/s, avg 1.468kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 00:23:42] Stats GPU 3 - cnv8: 1.641kh/s, avg 1.508kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 00:23:42] Stats GPU 4 - cnv8: 1.606kh/s, avg 1.484kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 00:23:42] Stats GPU 5 - cnv8: 1.667kh/s, avg 1.588kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 00:23:42] Stats GPU 6 - cnv8:   0.0 h/s, avg   0.0 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 00:23:42] Stats GPU 7 - cnv8:   0.0 h/s, avg   0.0 h/s, pool   0.0 h/s 0/0
[2018-10-31 00:23:42] Stats Total - cnv8: 9.918kh/s, avg 8.859kh/s, pool   0.0 h/s
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU!
by
wyzdic
on 29/10/2018, 01:56:48 UTC
Hi all!

Sorry I skip most support today, but i'm pleased to announce the V8-fixed GPU version is online!

that's the 0.33b2, named between b and c because it lacks some 0.33c CPU feature like MoneroOcean (which defaults to Monero-v8 in the GPU version). No autoswitch yet. It still contains the lastest CPU optims and netcode fixes.

The code is partially optimized and balanced for the old and new GPUs. I'll do more per-GPU optims later. Tested on some but not all of my cards, runs fine on RX and Tahiti, on drivers from 15.12 to 18.8
It may not be the fastest yet, but at least it works. Cry

Quote
Have your software work in ryzen apu?
Not tested yet sorry, I never took time to make the APU special code I wanted. Always switching to new topics.
Planned so far:
* Autoswitch for GPU
* Parameterless run for Service mode (all config in the file, even the pool or login)
* Monero v8 optims

My RX560 that reached 524h/s on V7 reaches 476 on JCE 0.33b2, i didn't have time to bench against other miners. I think i've still some room to optimize.

It also includes a very little optim for Heavy/Haven/Tube

edit: i forgot that the 0.33e for Windows and Linux CPU is online too. Contains some extra optims for old CPUs on v8


Vega64 is not bad. 2050 H/s
Vega56 only have 1800-1820.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU!
by
wyzdic
on 27/10/2018, 15:44:29 UTC
Hi JCE, Any information about gpu version?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's CryptoNote Windows CPU Miner v4.0
by
wyzdic
on 23/10/2018, 12:30:43 UTC
Because uncle Claymore have a premium quality stamp and JCE CPU is not.
1. Claymore's CPU miner do not hurting ryzens (58 C)
2. Claymore's CPU miner have a highest hs. (Ryzen 7 2700 - 680 hs at the same time with 6 GPU mining)

Any other CPU miner can do same??

Claymore, please, give back dev fee and update us.

Why not try the JCE CPU miner?

I have EPYC 7451*2, xmr-stak give me 3250-3300 h/s, JCE give me 3750 h/s.
I think you can try it.