Search content
Sort by
Showing 8 of 8 results by xBK201
Re: [ANN] [LIMX] [X11] LimeCoinX (RE-LAUNCH)(Friday, June 6th) Android Wallet, DGW3
Congrats on a smooth launch, everything seems to be running smoothly well done.
thank you very much.
Think we going bye bye on this one....forked this early??? something seems screwed..lol
Nothing is wrong with the code Just like Fercho said, right now it's on Kimoto Dark Gravity Wave until Block 100, diff is too high becasue of all people mining
Can someone explain me that
.. hehe 
The Difficulty is chained, First 99 blocks its using Kimoto gravity well, block 100 to 199 starts Dark Gravity wave, Block 200 to 249 Dark Gravity wave2 and block 250 to 300 Dark Gravity wave 3.
We did it this way to make a smooth transition.
It means that we need to hit block 100 so the difficulty starts decreasing. (also look at the Network hashrate its at 16 gigahashes per second)
Oh ok, ty
Re: [ANN] [LIMX] [X11] LimeCoinX (RE-LAUNCH)(Friday, June 6th) Android Wallet, DGW3
Think we going bye bye on this one....forked this early??? something seems screwed..lol
Nothing is wrong with the code Just like Fercho said, right now it's on Kimoto Dark Gravity Wave until Block 100, diff is too high becasue of all people mining
Can someone explain me that
.. hehe Re: [ANN][X11/X13] X11 (Darkcoin)/X13 (Marucoin) miner (based on sph-sgminer)
Any helpful soul mind helping me with some 6970 settings for x11? 
Getting 1.84 Mh/s with this settings:
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"intensity" : "15",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"temp-target" : "70",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-cutoff" : "85",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "128",
"lookup-gap" : "0",
"shaders" : "1536",
"thread-concurrency" : "8000"
"kernel" : "x11mod",Getting 1.84 Mh/s with this settings:
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"intensity" : "15",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"temp-target" : "70",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-cutoff" : "85",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "128",
"lookup-gap" : "0",
"shaders" : "1536",
"thread-concurrency" : "8000"
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-only" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"shares" : "0",
"failover-switch-delay" : "10",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-engine" : "0",
"gpu-fan" : "55",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-memclock" : "0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "8",
"gpu-vddc" : "0",
"intensity" : "18",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "64",
"lookup-gap" : "0",
"shaders" : "1536",
"thread-concurrency" : "8000",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"device" : "0"
}
2300kh/s @960/1375
Thanks again buddy
Re: [ANN][X11/X13] X11 (Darkcoin)/X13 (Marucoin) miner (based on sph-sgminer)
Any helpful soul mind helping me with some 6970 settings for x11?
Getting 1.84 Mh/s with this settings:
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"intensity" : "15",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"temp-target" : "70",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-cutoff" : "85",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "128",
"lookup-gap" : "0",
"shaders" : "1536",
"thread-concurrency" : "8000"
Getting 1.84 Mh/s with this settings:
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"intensity" : "15",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"temp-target" : "70",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-cutoff" : "85",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "128",
"lookup-gap" : "0",
"shaders" : "1536",
"thread-concurrency" : "8000"
Re: [ANN][XC] >> Mandatory Update to new Wallet - The first POS X11 anonymous wallet
boooo s and 82% 
It's not them, it's you. I am on their central server and my stats show 1.4% doa.
I got 0% doa
Re: [ANN][X11] X11 (Darkcoin etc) miner (based on sph-sgminer)
Hello, would anyone mind helping me with settings/code for a 6970? 
I'm getting 1.87 Mh/s is that bad?
Thanks.
I'm getting 1.87 Mh/s is that bad?
Thanks.
I'm getting 2300kh/s for 6970, 2800kh/s for 7950
Code:
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-only" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"scrypt" : true,
"shares" : "0",
"failover-switch-delay" : "1",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2,2,2,2",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-engine" : "0",
"gpu-fan" : "55",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-memclock" : "0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "8",
"gpu-vddc" : "0",
"intensity" : "18",
"xintensity" : "0",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "128,64,128,128,128",
"lookup-gap" : "0",
"shaders" : "1792,1536,1792,1792,1792",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192,8000,8192,8192,8192",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"device" : "0-4" }
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-only" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"scrypt" : true,
"shares" : "0",
"failover-switch-delay" : "1",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2,2,2,2",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-engine" : "0",
"gpu-fan" : "55",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-memclock" : "0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "8",
"gpu-vddc" : "0",
"intensity" : "18",
"xintensity" : "0",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "128,64,128,128,128",
"lookup-gap" : "0",
"shaders" : "1792,1536,1792,1792,1792",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192,8000,8192,8192,8192",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"device" : "0-4" }
Is the second one the 6970?