Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 167 results by xadsa418
Рост будет, а может и не будет, кто его знает. Но лично я жду цены для продажи не ниже 18к. хотя если продам по 12к. тоже выйду в неплохой плюс.
Для точки входа думаю надо пока повременить, скорее всего еще просядет чуток.
просадочка на 6к примерно, а потом уже можно и обратно потихонькуДля точки входа думаю надо пока повременить, скорее всего еще просядет чуток.
ну так-то много хороших (или почти) бирж есть без кик
stex, safetrade, cratex и т.п.
есть где торговать параноикам
я как истинный параноик всегда торгую без кик, валом бирж для этого есть. не вижу проблемstex, safetrade, cratex и т.п.
есть где торговать параноикам
Я верю, что у криптовалюты есть будущее и в долгосрочной перспективе она точно будет расти. Не вся конечно, но биткоин и некоторые из топовых альтов точно вырастут.
у меня есть увереность , что следующий годом роста топа и битка. В щиткоины стараюсь уже не лезть, есть горький опытRe: [ANN]Vertcoin- 1 ASIC - 0- Lyra2REv2- Decentralised-GPU Mineable-Open Source
If we can generate a CSV transaction with a locktime for an output TXID, and get Vrn to mine a block that spends that transaction before it should be spendable, we should be able to get it to fork away, I think?
Can you provide more info about it? What is Vrn? Does Vertcoin already activated CSV?Re: [ANN]Vertcoin- 1 ASIC - 0- Lyra2REv2- Decentralised-GPU Mineable-Open Source
Total VTC hashrate is about 26Gh and there is about ~18GH on nicehash. So, generally anybody can spend about 1BTC, rent 18GH (70% hashrate of the network) for day and activate segwit? Am I right?
According to zebbra2014 request.
My analysis of SuperCoin. I do it for free (unless otherwise specified) for interesting(for me) coins.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=1055, codehash=f3be8440a92c00377ab4; Well, actually here a lot of changes related to anonymity mixer, there is nothing that looks suspicious for holders, however i cant say how its reliably for keeping anonymity, because i'm not specialist it that filed
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good shrmcoin
SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar shrmcoin, diff=33, codehash=b7260b1f973355625d02; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=31, codehash=7c584ef3f56569f267e1; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=2, codehash=755d39d060ed2fb9c0b8; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Most similar arch, diff=1, codehash=8d862dbc639fa2ceaa57; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=6, codehash=e953a30a7bd9fcd67862; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=6, codehash=dc163ad32602d21c3d77; Manually inspected, Good
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
My analysis of SuperCoin. I do it for free (unless otherwise specified) for interesting(for me) coins.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=1055, codehash=f3be8440a92c00377ab4; Well, actually here a lot of changes related to anonymity mixer, there is nothing that looks suspicious for holders, however i cant say how its reliably for keeping anonymity, because i'm not specialist it that filed
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good shrmcoin
SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar shrmcoin, diff=33, codehash=b7260b1f973355625d02; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=31, codehash=7c584ef3f56569f267e1; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=2, codehash=755d39d060ed2fb9c0b8; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Most similar arch, diff=1, codehash=8d862dbc639fa2ceaa57; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=6, codehash=e953a30a7bd9fcd67862; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=6, codehash=dc163ad32602d21c3d77; Manually inspected, Good
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
Re: [MXT] ★ MarteXcoin ★ X13 / Pow+PoS 50% ★ Proof of Developer/Source ★
My analysis of MarteXcoin. I do it for free (unless otherwise specified) for interesting(for me) coins.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=10, codehash=ea87191ba07cc4ed0596; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar blackcoin, diff=2, codehash=9f612a31e9d7987b3d9c; Manually inspected, Good
SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=9, codehash=cd760d5189e9a9e1e5ca; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=3, codehash=bf91c0738280826dad2f; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=16, codehash=7784abcbb69fd9157d3d; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=608be0786db465b05650; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=10, codehash=b23bcfb0972c969ca3cf; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=17, codehash=ceafd53f2071326fa67f; Manually inspected, Good
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=10, codehash=ea87191ba07cc4ed0596; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar blackcoin, diff=2, codehash=9f612a31e9d7987b3d9c; Manually inspected, Good
SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=9, codehash=cd760d5189e9a9e1e5ca; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=3, codehash=bf91c0738280826dad2f; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=16, codehash=7784abcbb69fd9157d3d; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=608be0786db465b05650; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=10, codehash=b23bcfb0972c969ca3cf; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=17, codehash=ceafd53f2071326fa67f; Manually inspected, Good
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
Re: [ANN] [DRZ-V3] [DROIDZ-V3] [ANTI-INSTAMINE] - A FRESH NEW START - WALLET 3.0.1
Thank you, chrysophylax. I misread OP as 2.5m coins total and thought there is fraud.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good blackcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar bucks, diff=15, codehash=1614ae5d2c3ad8f7dc5f; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good blackcoin
AcceptToMemoryPool Good bucks
SendMessages Good bucks
CheckProofOfWork Good dash blackcoin
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar bucks, diff=18, codehash=a462278b5c7e9a9ffd24; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar midnight, diff=23, codehash=1f4f42698dec70cd6bb2; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=e81ce550d5d18dd509af; Manually inspected, Good
GetTransaction Most similar blackcoin arch, diff=20, codehash=7858e158e4599c2ec9a8; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=15, codehash=96ffb7293de292b70f9f; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
GetProofOfStakeLimit Most similar arch, diff=2, codehash=9350f436ca727852abcb; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Most similar bucks, diff=14, codehash=2cfb213b75b47886caec; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar bucks, diff=2, codehash=05095919e7df629fba28; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good blackcoin
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good blackcoin
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good blackcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar bucks, diff=11, codehash=5b33ca3968c6d9b60ae8; Manually inspected, Good
Not found funcs ['ComputeMinStake', 'ComputeMinWork']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good 5,500,000 coins in first block
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good 2,500,000 coins in 23820 block
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good blackcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar bucks, diff=15, codehash=1614ae5d2c3ad8f7dc5f; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good blackcoin
AcceptToMemoryPool Good bucks
SendMessages Good bucks
CheckProofOfWork Good dash blackcoin
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar bucks, diff=18, codehash=a462278b5c7e9a9ffd24; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar midnight, diff=23, codehash=1f4f42698dec70cd6bb2; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=e81ce550d5d18dd509af; Manually inspected, Good
GetTransaction Most similar blackcoin arch, diff=20, codehash=7858e158e4599c2ec9a8; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=15, codehash=96ffb7293de292b70f9f; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
GetProofOfStakeLimit Most similar arch, diff=2, codehash=9350f436ca727852abcb; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Most similar bucks, diff=14, codehash=2cfb213b75b47886caec; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar bucks, diff=2, codehash=05095919e7df629fba28; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good blackcoin
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good blackcoin
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good blackcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar bucks, diff=11, codehash=5b33ca3968c6d9b60ae8; Manually inspected, Good
Not found funcs ['ComputeMinStake', 'ComputeMinWork']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good 5,500,000 coins in first block
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good 2,500,000 coins in 23820 block
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
Re: [VERGE][XVG] VERGE [POW][Scrypt][privacy focused - full TOR/i2P resources]
main.cpp, CBlock::AcceptBlock() ln2152 https://github.com/vergecurrency/VERGE/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2152
main.h
Code:
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > CUTOFF_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : No proof-of-work allowed anymore (height = %d)", nHeight));
if (IsProofOfStake() && nHeight > DISABLE_POS_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-stake at height %d", nHeight));
//XVG will be pure PoW until modifier_switch_block
if (IsProofOfStake() && nHeight < MODIFIER_SWITCH_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-stake at height %d", nHeight));
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : No proof-of-work allowed anymore (height = %d)", nHeight));
if (IsProofOfStake() && nHeight > DISABLE_POS_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-stake at height %d", nHeight));
//XVG will be pure PoW until modifier_switch_block
if (IsProofOfStake() && nHeight < MODIFIER_SWITCH_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-stake at height %d", nHeight));
main.h
Code:
static const int CUTOFF_POW_BLOCK = 4248000; // POW end of block 4,248,000
static const int DISABLE_POS_BLOCK = 1; // DISABLE POS BLOCKS AT START for second reject pos
static const int MODIFIER_SWITCH_BLOCK = 6000000; // disabled first reject blocks
So currently Verge is pure PoW coin, because PoS block to be accepted should has height both less then 1 and higher then 6mil. And blockchain will stuck at 4,248,000 block(a few years later). Is it desired behaviour?static const int DISABLE_POS_BLOCK = 1; // DISABLE POS BLOCKS AT START for second reject pos
static const int MODIFIER_SWITCH_BLOCK = 6000000; // disabled first reject blocks
Re: [ANN] [U] UCoin丨Pure PoS丨Web wallet | UWallet丨USnake | UFaucet | More
I decided to check some old good coins, started from UCoin. Good, as expected.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=10, codehash=7acf425f6f4df6d83c7b; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good arch
SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=52923f0e242d7d094946; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=6, codehash=733005b0dcf1db502dd9; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=2, codehash=c08c017b2233239318a9; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=10, codehash=7acf425f6f4df6d83c7b; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good arch
SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=52923f0e242d7d094946; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=6, codehash=733005b0dcf1db502dd9; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=2, codehash=c08c017b2233239318a9; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
Re: [c0c0] c0fferC0in - Cryptocurrency for Gemstones > Now On YoBit < > Store Open <
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good blackcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar bucks, diff=4, codehash=42285947e660a4465539; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good blackcoin
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=12, codehash=3e97e0bb346868eee6c4; Manually inspected, Good
GetTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=6, codehash=04e648650e87c93eb3f3; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=3, codehash=368eda2a62c8c5ad87f7; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessages Good blackcoin
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good blackcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good blackcoin
GetProofOfStakeLimit Most similar blackcoin, diff=6, codehash=91f73c7fa26adff04635; Manually inspected, Good
AcceptToMemoryPool Good blackcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good blackcoin
SendMessages Most similar bucks, diff=3, codehash=53e2f6dc1c52abb843b1; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage Good blackcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good dash blackcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good blackcoin
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good blackcoin
Not found funcs ['ComputeMinStake', 'ComputeMinWork']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good blackcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar bucks, diff=4, codehash=42285947e660a4465539; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good blackcoin
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=12, codehash=3e97e0bb346868eee6c4; Manually inspected, Good
GetTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=6, codehash=04e648650e87c93eb3f3; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=3, codehash=368eda2a62c8c5ad87f7; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessages Good blackcoin
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good blackcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good blackcoin
GetProofOfStakeLimit Most similar blackcoin, diff=6, codehash=91f73c7fa26adff04635; Manually inspected, Good
AcceptToMemoryPool Good blackcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good blackcoin
SendMessages Most similar bucks, diff=3, codehash=53e2f6dc1c52abb843b1; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage Good blackcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good dash blackcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good blackcoin
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good blackcoin
Not found funcs ['ComputeMinStake', 'ComputeMinWork']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] Lotteries, MineCraft Integration, Sportsbetting and More!
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar shrmcoin, diff=4, codehash=639fa24760ed58774619; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Good shrmcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar shrmcoin, diff=12, codehash=cbd818eb6d10fc961e90; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good shrmcoin
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar shrmcoin, diff=4, codehash=639fa24760ed58774619; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Good shrmcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar shrmcoin, diff=12, codehash=cbd818eb6d10fc961e90; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good shrmcoin
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
Re: [BRDD] - BeardDollars - Scrypt - PoW/PoS - 15% annual interest.
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good arch
GetNextTargetRequiredV2 Most similar arch, diff=4, codehash=639fa24760ed58774619; Manually inspected, Good
GetNextTargetRequiredV1 Most similar arch, diff=1, codehash=9df2943f5c65a6780b0f; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage Most similar shrmcoin, diff=18, codehash=0733405866c5b2a95f88; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar arch, diff=2, codehash=7cf1a3b12897da3728c1; Manually inspected, Good
AcceptToMemoryPool Most similar arch, diff=46, codehash=d850939e63cf63e48330; Manually inspected, Good
SendMessages Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=9a948d1864ac06c83c3f; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=5, codehash=edc2e935cdbc84a44273; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
GetTransaction Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=14, codehash=fe2eafe6295d4fa4f73b; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good arch
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
The only one thing i didn't get is how you calculated totalsupply? 150000*50+212121 = 7,712,121
GetNextTargetRequiredV2 Most similar arch, diff=4, codehash=639fa24760ed58774619; Manually inspected, Good
GetNextTargetRequiredV1 Most similar arch, diff=1, codehash=9df2943f5c65a6780b0f; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage Most similar shrmcoin, diff=18, codehash=0733405866c5b2a95f88; Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar arch, diff=2, codehash=7cf1a3b12897da3728c1; Manually inspected, Good
AcceptToMemoryPool Most similar arch, diff=46, codehash=d850939e63cf63e48330; Manually inspected, Good
SendMessages Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=9a948d1864ac06c83c3f; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=5, codehash=edc2e935cdbc84a44273; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
GetTransaction Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=14, codehash=fe2eafe6295d4fa4f73b; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good arch
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
The only one thing i didn't get is how you calculated totalsupply? 150000*50+212121 = 7,712,121
There is no restriction, but there is also no reward. For initial distribution some sort of block generation is neccesary. Thanks for thinking with us.
It is potentially dangerous due to possibility of 51% attack. It will be safer to include restriction during next fork.Re: [TAKEOVER][ANTI] AntiBitcoin [SHA-256] POW/POS l Site l Shop l Forum l Giveaways
@Kingaltcoins asked me to check this coin:
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=6, codehash=f8aa4263fd67a608ed8d; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage Good shrmcoin
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=f0be278c1967cf2f2494; Manually inspected, Good
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good shrmcoin
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=6, codehash=f8aa4263fd67a608ed8d; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage Good shrmcoin
CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=f0be278c1967cf2f2494; Manually inspected, Good
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good shrmcoin
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
I don't know about your 1st statement if PoW mining is possible or not,
I did just try setgenerate true 4 in the console and it did not work to generate a PoW block,
if there are more commands, please share.
Your line 2 is totally wrong, PoS & PoW difficulty are not shared among any coin, they can't be , there are two independent ways to generate coins.
Same issue with the block freezing happened with PHS a few weeks ago, no big deal , as more blocks are available for staking the network returns to normal speed.
I still think that blockchain accept PoW blocks, however i missed that GetLastBlockIndex in this coin account on whether block is PoS or PoW. My mistake.
I will delete my previous message because it's partially untrue.
Your totally wrong about things here
Here is comparison of CBlock::AcceptBlock between standart codebase abd yours.
https://www.diffchecker.com/mc8jqidu
Left is yours.
You deleted check for Last_Pow_Block there. Where did wallet restrict PoW blocks?
Re: [GBIT] GRAVITYBITS - SHA256 - POW/hiPOS - GravityBits Auctions
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=bbf48bacdea061095019; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage Good shrmcoin
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar blackcoin, diff=3, codehash=5c77fb68fcd0580d7737; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=bbf48bacdea061095019; Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage Good shrmcoin
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Most similar blackcoin, diff=3, codehash=5c77fb68fcd0580d7737; Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
Re: WARP - Something different ---- VPN & SYNC ---- YoBit & SafeCEX ----
Checked this one for myself.
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Most similar blackcoin arch, diff=3, codehash=5cc9b0e1ce75008aa09c; Manually inspected, Good
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar shrmcoin, diff=7, codehash=a086e085609b3a21da90; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Good shrmcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar shrmcoin, diff=12, codehash=cbd818eb6d10fc961e90; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good shrmcoin
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Most similar blackcoin arch, diff=3, codehash=5cc9b0e1ce75008aa09c; Manually inspected, Good
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Most similar shrmcoin, diff=7, codehash=a086e085609b3a21da90; Manually inspected, Good
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Good shrmcoin
ProcessMessage Most similar shrmcoin, diff=12, codehash=cbd818eb6d10fc961e90; Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good shrmcoin
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=bbf48bacdea061095019 Manually checked Good
ProcessMessage Good shrmcoin
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good shrmcoin
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this people check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically check code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bug. Earlz check code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that its safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
ComputeMinWork Good arch
SendMessages Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch
GetNextTargetRequired Good shrmcoin
CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch
GetTransaction Good shrmcoin
ComputeMinStake Good arch
CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=bbf48bacdea061095019 Manually checked Good
ProcessMessage Good shrmcoin
CBlock::CheckBlock Good shrmcoin
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch
ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good shrmcoin
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch
CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin
CheckProofOfWork Good arch
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch
CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch
ProcessMessages Good shrmcoin
CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this people check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically check code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bug. Earlz check code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that its safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.