Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 219 results by xcsler
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [VLR TOKEN] | VALOREM FOUNDATION | NICHE E-COMMERCE PLATFORM FOR THE 99%
by
xcsler
on 13/12/2017, 12:26:54 UTC
how much dollars does it cost to buy 500 VLR??
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [VLR TOKEN] | VALOREM FOUNDATION | NICHE E-COMMERCE PLATFORM FOR THE 99%
by
xcsler
on 07/12/2017, 11:58:00 UTC
Finally apparently a SUPER project, or just apparently? I'll be watching to find out the final outcome, good luck!
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [VLR TOKEN] | VALOREM FOUNDATION | NICHE E-COMMERCE PLATFORM FOR THE 99%
by
xcsler
on 05/12/2017, 11:19:43 UTC
The project looks good and keeps a concern! This should not be the first such a concept of the project!
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [VLR TOKEN] | VALOREM FOUNDATION | NICHE E-COMMERCE PLATFORM FOR THE 99%
by
xcsler
on 16/11/2017, 16:13:36 UTC
The project looks good and keeps a concern! This should not be the first such a concept of the project!
Post
Topic
Board Digital goods
Re: Buy AWS Credits $150 for $10 | Last batch never coming back | Best Offer
by
xcsler
on 14/08/2017, 15:33:32 UTC
Got the account. Everything went smooth. THanks!
Post
Topic
Board Wallet software
Re: Gocoin - totally different bitcoin client with deterministic cold wallet
by
xcsler
on 03/07/2017, 17:51:08 UTC
Great presentation at the Future of Bitcoin!
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Craig Wright: "You dont need to hold the blockchain. Its ok if only banks do."
by
xcsler
on 02/07/2017, 14:15:40 UTC
Someone can't simply create something revolutionary in the financial system as bitcoin (which stands against everything the banking system represents) and still support banks, this simply make no sense to me, the contradiction is definitely there. I wouldn't take a word from Craig Wright seriously. I'm not even sure why and how he is back suddenly.


I can see how someone would trust a banking system based on hard money while at the same time trying to destroy a banking system based on fiat currency. These are two very different types of banks.
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: Restored Wallet, no addresses
by
xcsler
on 07/04/2017, 18:14:56 UTC
Now try restarting Armory so that it can rescan the blockchain.
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: Resending transaction?
by
xcsler
on 02/04/2017, 03:13:42 UTC
Initial transaction finally confirmed after about 12 hours.
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: Resending transaction?
by
xcsler
on 01/04/2017, 17:17:09 UTC
Also, I can find the transaction on blockchain.info so I assume it's in the mempool.
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Topic OP
Resending transaction?
by
xcsler
on 01/04/2017, 17:12:36 UTC
I sent a transaction with way too low a fee (like 8 sat/byte). Can I safely resend a new transaction from Armory with a higher fee? If so do I have to clear the unconfirmed one from my wallet?
Thank you.
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: Moving coins without online wallet
by
xcsler
on 28/03/2017, 20:53:02 UTC
Thanks Goatpig.
Unfortunately my offline machine is 32bit windows and I don't think I can compile.

One question I still have is why I couldn't broadcast from Electrum after importing my addresses to the online Electrum and the corresponding private keys to the offline Electrum? Why would my Armory setup matter at all in the case where I was using Electrum? Do the addresses not correspond to the private keys?

Thanks again.
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: Moving coins without online wallet
by
xcsler
on 28/03/2017, 20:25:32 UTC

Quote
Give me the versions of:

1) Your node
2) Your online Armory
3) Your offline signer (if applicable)



1)Node Bitcoin version v0.9.3.0-g40d2041-beta
2)Online Armory 0.91.2
3)Offline signer  0.82.2-alpha

Quote
Do you not have bitcoin-qt installed?

No. I just have bitcoind



Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: Moving coins without online wallet
by
xcsler
on 28/03/2017, 12:45:57 UTC
Thanks for your help Goatpig.

I'm using Armory wallet 0.91.2. with a watching online and cold storage offline setup.

I was able to make a couple of successful bitcoin transactions from Armory but then something went wrong and the network started rejecting my new ones. I was able to create new transactions but they weren't being confirmed and when I searched for the TxID I couldn't find that the network had even picked them up. (I remember a pre-broadcast pop up box about Armory padding and was unsure how to answer. I think I answered 'No' sometimes and 'Yes' other times)  Then I started having bitcoind problems.

I had Armory running bitcoind in the background on a linux OS but bitcoind is no longer working and I get the ": Error opening block database.
Do you want to rebuild the block database now?." error message when opening my online Armory. I haven't rebuilt the block database yet as my CLI/Linux skills aren't the best.
Does this mean I'd have to download the entire blockchain again?

---------------------------------------------------------------

Here's part of the debug log:

ActualTimespan = 1156544  before bounds
GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
nTargetTimespan = 1209600    nActualTimespan = 1156544
Before: 1c0f675c  000000000f675c00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
After:  1c0eba64  000000000eba64df7df7df7df7df7df7df7df7df7df7df7df7df7df7df7df7df
*** System error: CDB() : can't open database file wallet.dat, error -30973
Error: System error: CDB() : can't open database file wallet.dat, error -30973
ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
Loaded 40319 blocks from external file in 10793ms
Reindexing block file blk00001.dat...
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000000000064ac7c1b57c1d3b4fd3a3aeb2f26c96c2dde853eef230a271048
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000000000069cf03c847d7d1d58b44474021b31dc65a8e83fd3a08e60a768c
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=0000000000001a86c6e9a3bcf7fd86b054879fc31345ec032b6495fecbc7ab9b
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000000000013aa7f91d6578c8f8db27611f00e7979e5bd2a763c01bc54d55e
(lots more of these orphan blocks here) then...
msghand thread interrupt
opencon thread interrupt
addcon thread interrupt
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000000000054347fe0994fd78eb7cb7b619e62a0cb64d8f552688d50f9beb2
Flush(false)
wallet.dat refcount=0
wallet.dat checkpoint
wallet.dat detach
wallet.dat closed
DBFlush(false) ended               0ms
StopNode()
dumpaddr thread stop
net thread interrupt
Flushed 1358 addresses to peers.dat  48ms
2017-03-27 00:57:03

2017-03-27 00:57:03 Bitcoin version v0.9.3.0-g40d2041-beta (Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:42:15 +0200)
2017-03-27 00:57:03 Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1i 6 Aug 2014
2017-03-27 00:57:03 Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 4.8.30: (April  9, 2010)
2017-03-27 00:57:03 Default data directory /home/xxxx/.bitcoin
2017-03-27 00:57:03 Using data directory /home/xxxx/.bitcoin/
2017-03-27 00:57:03 Using at most 125 connections (1024 file descriptors available)
2017-03-27 00:57:03 Using 4 threads for script verification
2017-03-27 00:57:03 Using wallet wallet.dat
2017-03-27 00:57:03 init message: Verifying wallet...
2017-03-27 00:57:03 ERROR: CDBEnv::Open : Error -30974 opening database environment: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery
2017-03-27 00:57:03 Moved old /home/xxxx/.bitcoin/database to /home/xxxx/.bitcoin/database.1490576223.bak. Retrying.

-------------------------------------------------


Yes, I saw my balance in Electrum and was even able to crate a transaction online with Electrum and sign a transaction on the offline cold storage Electrum wallet after importing my Armory private keys.The transaction was rejected by the network when I tried to broadcast it from online Electrum. I got this error message: "error: The transaction was rejected by network rules.  (16: mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (Script failed an OP_EQUALVERIFY operation))"


Thanks again!
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: Moving coins without online wallet
by
xcsler
on 28/03/2017, 00:27:15 UTC
Tried sending from Electrum but got this message:

error: The transaction was rejected by network rules.  (16: mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (Script failed an OP_EQUALVERIFY operation))

I imported my Armory addresses into a watch only Electrum wallet and my Plain Base 58 Private Keys into an offline Electrum wallet.
I then made a transaction and signed it offline but get the above error immediately after trying to broadcast.

I seemed to be running into this problem with Armory too. I could sign the transaction offline but when I went to broadcast it to the bitcoin network it rejected it and the transaction never showed up blockexplorer.info. I had made a few successful transactions in Armory earlier in the day.

Any suggestions or ideas?

Thanks.
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Topic OP
Moving coins without online wallet
by
xcsler
on 27/03/2017, 17:05:48 UTC
I've been having some trouble with bitcoind and Armory and my online wallet isn't loading (I may submit another post later on addressing this issue). In the event that I can't find a solution what is the safest/easiest way to move my coins from my offline cold storage wallet?
Thanks in advance.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Fork off
by
xcsler
on 27/01/2015, 18:29:26 UTC
With all the alts out there Bitcoin still commands >99% of the market share. The free market and network effect have already essentially recognized a single cryptocurrency.

This is not an argument, it's just a statement. I can only reply that the free market can easily pick a better solution (it usually does) and mass-migrations of networked users are not unheard of.

Converting one to another was trivial.

Right... Tell me more about how "trivial" it is to convert currencies even today Smiley

Actually no, I am done here. You seem to have exhausted all the reasonable arguments Wink


In the past all the currencies represented different weights of gold. They were essentially the same currency.
Today that is not the case.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Fork off
by
xcsler
on 27/01/2015, 18:06:56 UTC


Can we trade a little security for wider adoption? Would wider adoption make it more valuable? Nobody knows.

How much will the value of bitcoin drop when people realize it can never scale? Nobody knows.


You aren't sacrificing wider adoption of Bitcoin. You are sacrificing wider on chain adoption of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin can scale perfectly well with off chain transactions. History has shown us this when the "off-chain US dollar" was backed by "on-chain gold."

Your trading a little bit of Bitcoin security for adoption is akin to making the gold more easy to counterfeit.

You are suggesting to use divide-and-conquer tactic and back it with historical facts demonstrating that it worked perfectly well for the conquerors. I suggest we keep united and seek for solutions together. Bitcoin is here to stir the pot and wake people up. Ding!

It worked for the conquerors because they stole all of the "on-chain bitcoins". FDR made it illegal for citizens to own gold in 1933 with Executive Order 6102. This can't be done with today's bitcoins because of the transparent distributed digital ledger. Your proposals weaken security and makes bitcoin confiscation more likely.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Fork off
by
xcsler
on 27/01/2015, 17:58:47 UTC
People would still be using Bitcoin just not on chain.
When the dollar was backed by gold it worked perfectly well and the country experienced its greatest growth.

The difference is - the government enforced a single currency. In a decentralized system, nobody will.

This severely hinders the utility: by adding a mental effort to decide which off-chain to use and by introducing friction at borders.

You will get the same mess we have with altcoins now, only it will also be even less clear what is securing each individual off-chain.

With all the alts out there Bitcoin still commands >99% of the market share. The free market and network effect have already essentially recognized a single cryptocurrency.

Also in the past the situation you worry about already existed. US Dollars, British Pounds, French Francs and other currencies were all backed by different weights of gold. Essentially these currencies can be thought of as off-chains. Converting one to another was trivial.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Fork off
by
xcsler
on 27/01/2015, 17:48:01 UTC


Can we trade a little security for wider adoption? Would wider adoption make it more valuable? Nobody knows.

How much will the value of bitcoin drop when people realize it can never scale? Nobody knows.


You aren't sacrificing wider adoption of Bitcoin. You are sacrificing wider on chain adoption of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin can scale perfectly well with off chain transactions. History has shown us this when the "off-chain US dollar" was backed by "on-chain gold."

Your trading a little bit of Bitcoin security for adoption is akin to making the gold more easy to counterfeit.