4 vegas in unbuntu 16.04, rocm 18, only  2 of them work.
vega 0 freezes linux and vega 3 stuck  

Start Mining...
Average speed (5s): 21.1958 sol/s | 23.3953 sol/s | 0 sol/s Total: 44.5911 sol/s
Average speed (5s): 23.7952 sol/s | 21.1958 sol/s | 0 sol/s Total: 44.991 sol/s
Error: lolMiner-zero detected that device 3 is stucked
Shutting down lolMiner-zero


Edit -- I see it is a RAM size issue, 4gb.

what am i doing wrong here? i have account on suprnova

I havent seen any coins announce they are forking. Its pretty stupid to hate a company that saved me a ton of money. I would buy 20 1070s to mine, (I have), why would I not buy one these instead. Less power, space, heat, cost, and various other pluses. People have warehouses full of GPUs. The hate for what Bitmain does, is ridiculous when GPUs are literally doing the same thing. Except they are using more power in some cases. If you think GPU miners arent causing the same issues, then you are naive. GPUs also cost more money per hash, and is also taking away a lot from th gaming industry causing huge disruption and price hikes. If any of you built a computer that mined better then anyone else, ALL of you would use it.

Thanks for the tip, im trying it out.

So far, ETH drops from 24Mh/s to 20MH/s  

Anyway, im geting bad results on SApphire Nitro+ RX 480 4GB
About 24MH/s ETH + 1.1Gh/s Decred is the best i can do at 1300/2000
Kinda sux, seeing people are geting 28Mh/s ETH on 470's.
Even if i tune down Decred to oblivion, ETH won't go past 24.5Mh/s  
Noobs shouldn't mine hehe.

what exactly do you mean with your question? Sorry!

I am mining ETH+DCR. The consumption is between 95W - 101W hashing 28MH/S. I have XFX RX470's.

Hash on RX 480 - 730H/s

ETH/ETC is more profitable than XMR

 Bad theory.

 I have yet to see ANYTHING where the performance of the RX 480 matches the RX 390X - even ETH which is very hard on memory (and is probably the point the RX 480 comes the closest to matching the RX 390X).

 ZEC has proven to be a lot less memory-hardened than it's developers appear to have intended it to be - at which point the far superior number of computer cores (abet as somewhat lower clock) of the R9 390x start pulling away from the RX 480.


 Keep in mind - the RX 480 is NOT a high end of "Enthusiast" range card like the R9 390x was for IT'S generation.
 It is targeted at the high end of "Mainstream" or the BOTTOM end of "Enthusiast" cards for the current generation.
 We still haven't seen the high-end *OR* the bottom-end of the "still in the works" CURRENT generation of AMD cards, much less the next-generation Vega to come.