Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 95 results by ydenys
Well, someone is clearly profiting from all those of new investors. Surely Tux knows who. Surely it can be stopped, but why if it brings such huge trade volume and nice revenue. Same as why give Bitcoinicas/Zhous funds to liquidators if they just sit and appreciate nicely, and only their past near-worthless dollar equivalent is really whats required by law.
I say, we have our own trading elite right here. Those scoopers with timed walls/bots who are privy to the magical 666 ddos crap, etc. and they would never be disclosed or have their accounts suspended by Gox. Full stop.
The only way is to educate the market
I say, we have our own trading elite right here. Those scoopers with timed walls/bots who are privy to the magical 666 ddos crap, etc. and they would never be disclosed or have their accounts suspended by Gox. Full stop.
The only way is to educate the market
Re: [8 Th/s] 50BTC.com - PPS|Stratum+Vardiff|Port 80|QIWI,Yandex,Mobile,LR,WM...
Anything is wrong with BTC payments? Mine is processing to my main (and only) addr for half a day now. It used to be instant. Is this a new feature you added or a glitch?
Ticket opened (same username). Please have a look. TIA.
Ticket opened (same username). Please have a look. TIA.
Ha, 27 pages, Budapest non-mining ASIC developer. 
Buy your healthy scepticism from Dr Fable here: 1DRFBLErdgDuGbczm2XXBNLtWzgRUzx1Uy
There is not even a worthy whore left to fly for to Budapest, not even one
[But thanks, got some wine to read this through F1 qualy cancelled
]
Buy your healthy scepticism from Dr Fable here: 1DRFBLErdgDuGbczm2XXBNLtWzgRUzx1Uy
There is not even a worthy whore left to fly for to Budapest, not even one
[But thanks, got some wine to read this through F1 qualy cancelled
]Re: Live debate tonight 7PM GMT - Gavin Andresen will be there
Yep, watched it. Gavin is a body washer in an NHS hospital (relatives, do hope he did not fingered your loved ones) . Pathetic, all of them. Gavin, please drink more/less/take a plug out of your bum/relax. Well, i guess youll need quite a few years on Bitcoin Foundations payroll before you can take it easy, man. No pun intended. I had sponsored you, hope itll do some good to represent Bitcoin. But thanks for trying, i guess.
timestamp and sign/verify bits of copyright material such as poems/ideas/etc. with the choice of making it private, public or designated for the recipient?
And maybe have the Bitcoin Foundation to maintain a searchable database of such submissions so it does not get out of hand.
Miners fees must be incorporated into the system as well to benefit community and filter the files/messages initially.
I understand that it can be done right now (in a way), but it appears to be needing much work still.
Also there should be an easy way to verify an identity of a wallet owner using just software/webcam. I foresee this as one of the major requirements for Bitcoins wider adoption.
And maybe have the Bitcoin Foundation to maintain a searchable database of such submissions so it does not get out of hand.
Miners fees must be incorporated into the system as well to benefit community and filter the files/messages initially.
I understand that it can be done right now (in a way), but it appears to be needing much work still.
Also there should be an easy way to verify an identity of a wallet owner using just software/webcam. I foresee this as one of the major requirements for Bitcoins wider adoption.
About strong move, security and responsibility from the point of view of speculant.
You all know what happened right after price bump in Jun 2011. Mtgox got hacked.
Because unknown service coded on knees was not valued in hackers while bitcoin didnt have significant value. But since bump, MtGox security gained value in hackers' eyes. They realized that there are millions of dollars located there and nobody there doesn't mind about security. And we got what we got.
The same stuff with pirateat40, bitcoinica and others. Anonymouse nature of bitcoin destroys any responsibility in service owners mind.
There is no central authority in Bitcoin which will force services to complete identification and force to meet security standards like PCI-DSS like it is done in payment card industry by banks and VISA.
And what does Bitcoin Foundation do about that? Nothing. They just scream about bitcoin price gaining value 100500% in press release.
They dont realize that if Bitcoin will get $100 in value - 80% of bitcoin services will be hacked and scam people for money due lack of security and resposibility.
All major drops were due to or accelerated with some big service fuckup.
Bitcoin will not get enought liquidity on market until Bitcoin Foundation will not bring to community central advisory authority for bitcoin centralized services.
It must force services to meet security and responsibility standards.
It should put site seal for approved services which hints common users that service is verified and keeps security standards.
It should widthdraw site seal from services which ignore users complains or security standards and identification procedures. This will hint common users to be careful with this service.
I think I dont need to explain, that wide usage of Bitcoins needs price stability - coz everyone fear volatility.
And price stabilty only may be reached with enough liquidity on market.
But enough liquidity on market can't be reached without people trust in centralized services. They just scaried to do this. They fear scam.
So we need a service which will verify, identify and watch for keeping security stadards by existsting verified Bitcoin centralized services.
Please provide us with one. Thanks.
You all know what happened right after price bump in Jun 2011. Mtgox got hacked.
Because unknown service coded on knees was not valued in hackers while bitcoin didnt have significant value. But since bump, MtGox security gained value in hackers' eyes. They realized that there are millions of dollars located there and nobody there doesn't mind about security. And we got what we got.
The same stuff with pirateat40, bitcoinica and others. Anonymouse nature of bitcoin destroys any responsibility in service owners mind.
There is no central authority in Bitcoin which will force services to complete identification and force to meet security standards like PCI-DSS like it is done in payment card industry by banks and VISA.
And what does Bitcoin Foundation do about that? Nothing. They just scream about bitcoin price gaining value 100500% in press release.
They dont realize that if Bitcoin will get $100 in value - 80% of bitcoin services will be hacked and scam people for money due lack of security and resposibility.
All major drops were due to or accelerated with some big service fuckup.
Bitcoin will not get enought liquidity on market until Bitcoin Foundation will not bring to community central advisory authority for bitcoin centralized services.
It must force services to meet security and responsibility standards.
It should put site seal for approved services which hints common users that service is verified and keeps security standards.
It should widthdraw site seal from services which ignore users complains or security standards and identification procedures. This will hint common users to be careful with this service.
I think I dont need to explain, that wide usage of Bitcoins needs price stability - coz everyone fear volatility.
And price stabilty only may be reached with enough liquidity on market.
But enough liquidity on market can't be reached without people trust in centralized services. They just scaried to do this. They fear scam.
So we need a service which will verify, identify and watch for keeping security stadards by existsting verified Bitcoin centralized services.
Please provide us with one. Thanks.
Sorry for not reading through all thread, but what you purpose is exactly what is now devaluing current money and making bitcoin valuable by being different.
There is an issue in a very core of present trust in authority-based value storage/exchange system and until it is correctly addressed, this [alternative] concept has little, but quite certain value.
One can simply argue that the current worth of bitcoin is solely based on p2p, free will, free market value exchange model (it may be as hypothetical as you/others like you choose it to be) and while your proposal, correctly implemented, would certainly attract some comfortably big-pocketed users and even move the currency forward, it is nothing but a copy of existing model with different players (different only so far).
However, it is likely to discourage current majority from using it and will simply kill the fundamental idea of an individual(s) being solely responsible for their own worth. (Which i like).
Rather than propagate protected by the state/central authority/Jesus the god concept why not to leave it as it is and rely on a free will and free market model which is always at least morally clean and is in itself beautiful. Sure, we all are imperfect, but do most of us need protection from ourselves? Time will tell
Saying that, i would like to see an attempt (and it is as sure as rain to follow) of BF/other entity to try and regulate bitcoin this and majoritys reply to this (not price fluctuations/miners/future technology, etc) is what will make or break this concept.
Re: [3700 Gh/s] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too
To confirm it works okay now, no missing shares.
http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1717/12469371.jpg
PM was also sent, please reply.
TIA.
http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1717/12469371.jpg
PM was also sent, please reply.
TIA.
Re: [3700 Gh/s] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too
Yes, second to second. All missing shares are indeed missing. I had restarted and left one miner connected, will let you know when/if it is working correctly.
Re: [3700 Gh/s] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too
Nothing to do with Stratum, i’m afraid. (I wish Deepbit would implement it ) Using the non-Stratum client. And this is the result: http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/7479/23362533.jpg
Please fix it or see the rest of my miners gone for good. Also do consider refunding the fee since it is 100% pool issue (same with phoenix 1.7.5). TIA>
) Using the non-Stratum client. And this is the result: http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/7479/23362533.jpg
Please fix it or see the rest of my miners gone for good. Also do consider refunding the fee since it is 100% pool issue (same with phoenix 1.7.5). TIA>