as long as we are using this alts as speculations or perhaps investment, and not treating it as the way it should be (intended to) replacing the fiat system, yes we are still on the bubble, which made me wonder. How long till this bubble burst becometh a reality

this is conspiracy! whenever the price(s) skyrocketed
there is one or more big exchange get blown out!
this is the pattern..
this is the signal..

P.S. Please don't take this statement to seriously, i am serious!

i thought bytecoin have a value, but the forum is filled with spams, no moderator..
the download section it self was not maintained..
but the github have an impulse arround 3 months ago..

why oh why... anonimity.. zero fees..

i've been told since forever that in order for something to have value, you need to exchange it for other value

i am trying to understand your goal here, please kindly bare with me
here is my currently simple brain could understand thus far..

1. you are going to create a new coin
2. it will be based on the blockchain terms
3. it will be decentralized (mainly to prevent double spending attacks), and the consensus / block creation will not depends on "fiat buying power"?

"fiat buying power" means the power an entity able to purchase something for adding block to the chain:
1) POW consensus: gpus, asics, cpus, hdds, rams
2) POS consensus: The coins it self
3) Tendermint consensus: the voting is basically measured by entity power to buy a "node"

yes you may have a breakthrough and answer for those "centralized by fiat power" consensus system,
but will the value of this new coin trully make the developer/early adopters insanely wealthy?
if anyone could make that coin basicly without exchanging what they are currently having, what would become the coin value other than early adopters initial speculations?

IDK about the development of ETC, but the developers, marketing, managers behind ETH development should make ETH more valuable than ETC

is this safe in a decentralized network kind of ways?
the pool ubiqpool.io have hashing power of more than 80% of all network hashes..

how many confirmation should we wait for a transaction to be considered ok?

i see that the blocks are only generated by ubiqpool

i think the miner should consider to distribute their hashing power to other pools available

let's look into the history, we had bitcoin lower than $200, but to the best of my knowledge,
relating that to the electricity costs, mining will become a loss instead of profit
but to my knowledge we didn't see the 51% attack..
i am guessing the 'difficulty' implemented by mr nakamoto is a great filter for this kind of situation,
when there are no miner, the diff will go down, much much down even your android phone can do the mining..
and when the diff go down, a miner or two will start their miner to snap the profit as much as they could, automaticaly this will give the 'decentrilized network state',
thus preventing the 51% attack

sorry, is this completely off-the grid system?
why not using a combination with the on-grid system?
if i may ask, what's the consideration of going with that route?

kalau ada pajak berarti kepemilikan juga dilindungi Undang-Undang
pajak = hak = kewajiban

kalau sudah sampai taraf candu memang susah gan, sebaiknya bertanya kepada komunitasnya sendiri,
itulah kenapa ada group-group 'healing'
soalnya semua anggota udah ngalamin itu, jadi bisa lebih diterima saran-sarannya..

kalau saran dari kita mungkin sebatas norma-norma dan paradigma tertentu saja yang bisa di utarakan..

Semoga berhasil menanggulangi kecanduan-nya gan!

Kalau dilihat2 bitcoin koq kenapa ya sifatnya selalu ekstreem

market naik harga besar-besaran..
eehh ada exchanger gox ---> efek maling

mulai naek lagi..
eehh pemerintahan China buat kebijakan baru.. --> efek regulasi

naek drastis lagi..
ada 'garpu keras' harga anjlok lagi.. --> efek galau pemakai-pemakainya sendiri

mungkin ini kita harus belajar dari sejarah yah agan-agan.. kenapa nilai suatu 'benda' baik itu uang, emas, dan sekarang crypto-currency
bisa jadi stabil di kemudian harinya (kalaupun naek nggak akan naek terlalu ekstreem, kalopun turun, mudah2an nggak terlalu ekstreem juga)

stand proud crypto generation.. we have through them all

Mungkin kalo investasi di cryptocurrency nya nggak bakalan mau, soalnya harga bitcoin masih bisa dipengaruhi naik turunnya, volatilitasnya terlalu tinggi.
lain cerita kalau indonesia mulai terapkan teknologi blockchain di Indonesia..

nggak ada lagi cerita sertifikat ganda gaann 

I need a hint, please kindly elaborate more..
judging from the ownerships then if cars are fiat, and the hand grenade is the bitcoins, are you saying that eventually bitcoins considered illegal?
or i am guessing that my deductions are poor

my salary usually go through the banks, an usually the bank did not charge anything, but if i received bitcoins, when i convert it to fiat i will have to pay the fees for witdrawals..
unless i could find someone who do offline transactions

if you wanted to detect deposits and do withdrawal, You should just use those who provide APIs instead of creating one for yourself
the price you pay for building the security, the storage, hosting and bandwidth itself is almost in par with the prices and service at those providers

Do you planning on supporting the mobiles to?

So mostly everyone think that the most secure way to store the Bitcoin(s) are using a paper wallet? yes they are secure, it is getting more reliable if you are using the multisig approach

If we wanted the miners to keep on mining so that our transaction would become confirmed, then the price needs to become doubled when the halving occurred.. if not, what is the point of running those miners?

I think everything related to value have some kind of manipulation behinds it, weather it was manipulated for it's price / value, or it was manipulated to become a scarce resource, or it was manipulated within the legalities..
everything is..

i like the trust-less system it makes up for the blockchain, learning about the address generation, the blockchain, the transaction, the pow concept made me a better man