Search content
Sort by

Showing 2 of 2 results by z0x0fily
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: BRC-20 needs to be removed
by
z0x0fily
on 12/06/2023, 14:22:46 UTC
⭐ Merited by ETFbitcoin (1)
Do you mind sharing the link?

Sure, this is an NFT collection that inscribed a couple of packages that are commonly used, https://twitter.com/OnChainMonkey/status/1668059991327248384. This came as a follow up on Recursive Inscriptions proposal, basically splitting the data over multiple inscriptions and reusing them, removing some of the limitation that they had. A flood of JS packages in transactions is probably about to happen so that they can use it in their HTML inscriptions.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: BRC-20 needs to be removed
by
z0x0fily
on 12/06/2023, 05:38:17 UTC
⭐ Merited by vapourminer (1)
It's not only about BRC-20 which is usually under 1kb, people are inscribing much bigger files (https://www.ord.io/?contentType=video) at the moment for no apparent reason. I've almost never seen someone storing their NFT's collection files on Ethereum, but ORD community seems to encourage doing that on bitcoin and consider it innovative. I've seen one of the communities celebrate inscribing some of their used node_module packages on bitcoin a few hours ago.