I am not a developer but I hope one of those who believe in this project who knows how to code can come out a wallet that will not show at least 7 virus and malwares,it's ok if the wallet shows one or two but seven is not a good  one,people will worry running that wallet.

My build:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e23f98565aafdeb7635f093d74d71b5cb04db106577bfdc3e638d7613cafc332/analysis/1480458965/

so you have viruses there?

My compile from source code and tested with virustotal showed only 2 issues, both of them are Bitcoin miners, which are understanable as it has a miner in QT client. I don't understand where come the 12 issues shown in the virustotal report from dev's build.

I know and I did spend, but my question is that after mint, I don't see it in the zerocoin tab in windows client. There was nothing there although I minted it successful and was able to spend it later.

Its funny how this open-source thing works. . Someone spent many months (if not years) developing something, then he publishes it as open-source, and in 1-5 days it is being copied and exploited, often without giving any credit to the original. I know open-source is good, but sometimes it is getting ridiculous. I am coming from closed-source business world myself, and though I like open-source, but sometimes I think there should be limits on that (maybe a grace period of few months/years before the source is opened).

Do you guys think those clones are harming the original or are good for it...? In a perfect world they should help (by working in parallel and finding and fixing issues), but in reality I am not sure...

ZOIN, please can you release a roadmap! there has to be a certain stability and prospect. Great such a new coin but the way it is launched is terrible.

Hi, are you still working on the new algo? Where can I find more info about such algo?

Thanks in advance.

The GIT repository history is not telling the same. The only more or less considerably sized commit was done 16 minutes ago. The rest were one-liners, related only to founders reward and version bump.
If you indeed made some bug fixes in the original commit, then why didn't you fork your repository from the original ZCoin one, so people could see the difference (if any). Creating an independent repository instead of cloning the original project is a bad practice, mostly aimed at hiding something.

ZCOIN is not just "other version of the coin", its the original one.

ZCOIN developers created the tech (the implementation), spent many months on coding, and they are the ones who know that code.

Zoin is just copy-pasted by some greedy people, who are not even able to maintain the code. The most they can do, is to wait for real Zcoin devs to release they code, so they can copy it to their "zoin"  
Their only capability is to take profit of other people's work, and also make a P&D to take some money out of your pocket. Those clone generators are ridiculous, and worthless.

And take note - I am not just spreading FUD to get buy orders filled. I do not own zoin, and do not want to. I am just really pissed off by those worthless copy-paste clones, and by people supporting them.

Please tell me the miner for AMD has two CPU idle can't find

It's nice that Zoin improved ZCoin. Why do we use Lyra2 here at all? Any adavantages? Would it be the same to use scrypt or X11 etc as PoW while still keeping the zerocoin features?

Also dev what's the difference between lyra2 and lyra2-zoin? why create a different flavor? When I check the Lyra2 code, I don't see any differences though.

The title of the thread is misleading. It should read "No more Founder's reward starting from block 5001".

Dev what are those bounties about?

Dev care to explain how algo diff was fixed?
What it did, why it did it?
What has changed, how it affects?

LYRA2(BEGIN(thash), 32, BEGIN(pblock->nVersion), 80, BEGIN(pblock->nVersion), 80, 2, 32768, 256);
-->
if (LYRA2(BEGIN(thash), 32, BEGIN(nVersion), 80, BEGIN(nVersion), 80, 2, 330, 256) < 0)
thash = 0;

No one wants to mine eyes closed!

He is explaining this because he was caught,but there was no mention this on the announcement,if he is transparent and honest,he will have told us in the first place.

Honesty is still the best policy.