Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 83 results by zyzzbrah
Re: [ANN][BITS][Bitstar] Improved performance wallet update coming soon...
I knew this coin would fly in the following days which is why I synced my wallet.
This coin has ideal total supply like bitcoin (21 million), and has nothing fancy on it. Just a solid altcoin.
Notice how bitcoinPlus and BitcoinDark are flying too.
Apparently big pump groups want to take those to %10,000+ while HF fears in btc are persistent
48 BTC order at 5000 sats right now, this is gonna fly
This coin has ideal total supply like bitcoin (21 million), and has nothing fancy on it. Just a solid altcoin.
Notice how bitcoinPlus and BitcoinDark are flying too.
Apparently big pump groups want to take those to %10,000+ while HF fears in btc are persistent
48 BTC order at 5000 sats right now, this is gonna fly
Re: @RogerVer lets make a deal. At least 60k, my BTU for your BTC.
The price is crashing due the chinese hashrate whale being bribed to cause this shitstorm by supporting buggy software against 80%+ of users and common sense in general.
so its all bribery? There's no real problem with Bitcoin? Everything is actually fine and we should just follow Greg Maxwell to victory?
no, we should follow jonald_fyookball and franky1 to victory
Re: [ANN][BITS][Bitstar] Improved performance wallet update coming soon...
I've download this: faststart_11092016_windows_1.4.0.0.rar
to use with the "Bitstar Full Services wallet"
and when I open it, im stuck in the Bitstar Wallet splash screen and it says "Loading block index..."
how long do I need to wait? its been like 10 minutes
to use with the "Bitstar Full Services wallet"
and when I open it, im stuck in the Bitstar Wallet splash screen and it says "Loading block index..."
how long do I need to wait? its been like 10 minutes
Re: SHOCKING: BU chief scientist: "We need Bitcoin's inflation rate to be non-zero"
OP, you are spinning this and putting words in Peter's mouth.
What he said is when the mining reward goes to 0 (in the year 2140),, its unclear what happens with the natural fee market.
No one in the BU camp is saying "we need to change the social contract and have more than 21M coins" which is what
you are implying.
Bitcoin will have a non-zero inflation rate for the next 120 years. And we could always decide to re-introduce the protocol enforced limit at that time if no other solution
is available.
What he said is when the mining reward goes to 0 (in the year 2140),, its unclear what happens with the natural fee market.
No one in the BU camp is saying "we need to change the social contract and have more than 21M coins" which is what
you are implying.
Bitcoin will have a non-zero inflation rate for the next 120 years. And we could always decide to re-introduce the protocol enforced limit at that time if no other solution
is available.
protocols solidify with time, pretty sure 120 years from now the protocol rules are set in stone otherwise bitcoin would be a failure as a store of wealth
this implies exactly what it implies. anything but certain 21 million limit coin is untolerable.
not to mention bu mechanism profits even more from mining pool centralization
whole thing is trash. and in 120 years bu devs would have killed bitcoin already anyway.
Code:
franky1: "ill pretend the newest BUcoin bug is core's fault"
^ logic problem exposed (error code: BUcoin is dogshit)
^ logic problem exposed (error code: BUcoin is dogshit)
BU was actually just a fork of core 0.12 (all core 0.12 bugs included)
bu just tweaked a few lines of code to allow dynamics and left it out there for the community of independent devs
it wasnt until fixes were done that people spotted some nodes hadnt upgraded post-fix. so exploited such.
funny part is assert(0) was actually a exploit that was able to harm core 0.12 too
also funny part is that BU devs didnt create it, and people didnt exploit it ntil it was patched.. which then made exploiters realsie that some users were not yet patched against it..
P.S
having BU screw up is actually a good promotion of why diverse brands SHOULD exist on bitcoins main net.
imagine however if EVERYONE was just running core and only core.
then imagine there was a issue with the db locks of the blockchain data..
oh wait.. no need to imagine it.. 2013's leveldb update which didnt factor in something when moving forward .. causing several hour stall and orphan event.
...
but now imagine if bitcoin remained diverse with many different implementations . if one codebase goes down.. only a few nodes go offline and everything else continues as normal.
so all you crybabies that want core centralisation .. imagine future events like the 2013 leveldb event
anyone who wants diversity. imagine this months 'oh well a few nodes went offline' no big deal
diversity is good. not bad.
keep bitcoin diverse and decentralised and independent. dont advocate for centralised power house
this is nonsense
there is enough diversity in core node versions, so if core screws up with an update, we fall back on the big amount of sub-latest core update nodes
bu adds no value
Re: DA DICE Signature Campaign - 'Da' BEST Yet | HIGHEST RATES! | JOIN THE FUN!
Great pay rates, I want to join someday when i grow up (to full member 
)
how to know how many spots are left? it has said "20 spots" for a while.
)how to know how many spots are left? it has said "20 spots" for a while.
Just check here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_RyLrCa3saxwHPz8mgPuNlV8ewuX7RlC15ZUQRVp99w/pubhtml
and good luck on levelling up.
I see 46 accounts, but i dont see any limit. You mean +20 after it says "new enrollees"? (so max 60 accounts)??
Check available spots.
It shows the number of spots available for each member. (It might change too).
Thanks, I did not see it.
How does the avatar deal work? its a 10% extra per week? for example you make 60 posts, you get 0.054 but while wearing avatar you get 0.0594?
Re: DA DICE Signature Campaign - 'Da' BEST Yet | HIGHEST RATES! | JOIN THE FUN!
Great pay rates, I want to join someday when i grow up (to full member )
how to know how many spots are left? it has said "20 spots" for a while.
)how to know how many spots are left? it has said "20 spots" for a while.
Just check here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_RyLrCa3saxwHPz8mgPuNlV8ewuX7RlC15ZUQRVp99w/pubhtml
and good luck on levelling up.
I see 46 accounts, but i dont see any limit. You mean +20 after it says "new enrollees"? (so max 60 accounts)??
Re: [BIT-X.com] Earn Bitcoins by Posting | Signature Campaign
It makes literally 0 sense to force 2FA upon people. Big annoying warning that says "2FA is very recommended" it's ok, but not forcing it, there is a reason no exchange does that. I use public numbers to bypass SMS verifications all the time myself because there's no reason you would need to give personal data at that level to do that. Again, there's a reason you don't need phone verification in any exchange to log in and do basic alt to alt trading. Of course, when fiat is involved, it's normal to start wanting more credentials, but forcing people with phone verification alienates people to use your service.
If you live in a third world country, or lets say you don't have a smartphone (a LOT of people still don't), you can't use Google Auth which leads to being forced to check your phone every single time you log in. This is a big no-no.
Reconsider how you run this.
If you live in a third world country, or lets say you don't have a smartphone (a LOT of people still don't), you can't use Google Auth which leads to being forced to check your phone every single time you log in. This is a big no-no.
Reconsider how you run this.
How does it 'literally make no sense'? It literally does make sense because people lose their coins all the time and as soon as they do they bog down support with complaints asking where their coins have gone. And who are these people in the third world that don't have a phone but yet have the internet, computer and are actively involved in the crypto community?
Requiring people to receive their payments via an exchange account also makes little sense when you have a escrow paying participants. There wouldn't be anything to stop the exchange from seizing funds that participants receive prior to them being able to withdraw which defeats the point of using escrow in the first place.
It would make more sense to decrease rates by 0.5% and allow people to receive payment to any address that participants wish. Then people would not need to worry about accidentally eating the only way they can access their account
You'd think that after nearly 7 months of flawless payouts that people would have some trust/faith in a service (mind you, most actually do).
My point is that if someone were to get ahold of your phone then they could easily steal all of your bitcoin as well as the point that regardless of how 'flawless' payments have been that escrow is not really protecting anyone.
Yup, that's another thing. Receiving your payment directly in your BTC address is always a peace of mind. That, coupled with the forced 2FA thing is annoying. As far as I know, only this and Bitmixer offer automated payments. Too bad Bitmixer's payment's rate is shit and the rest are still stuck in the middle ages with the manual enrollment mess. Hopefully in the future someone hits the sweet spot with direct payments in your address, good rates and not compromising your privacy in the process.
If you were to check out this thread then you can see how much you could earn in various campaigns. There is really no advantage to "automatic" payouts as either way you still get your earnings in a timely manner. I think there might be one or two higher paying campaigns out there that allow you to receive payments to your own address what are those?
non automated campaings suck (at least the ones where you need to re-enroll every month or lose your spot). i only bother with those that give you a steady solid income, otherwise i get stressed out thinking i'll lose my spot next month because i didn't enroll on time.
and overall its great to be able to keep track of your earnings easier
Re: [BIT-X.com] Earn Bitcoins by Posting | Signature Campaign
I feel like quoting this here:
I agree. It's clear we are going to be stuck on this low (and getting lower?) price for a long time now. This is good news for anyone that is in the long term and understand BTC enough to know what's up. We can make more BTC off sig campaings and reaps the benefits later (since if the price was 1K, we would get paid way less BTC).
Im just hoping, as soon as Bit-x can deal with a raise, please do, and the rest should follow as well, im sure it will happen and payments will start getting raised, and if no signature campaing does it the users should force them to do it.
Im not posting much lately, a lot of work, i'll try to post a bit during my small breaks. In any case, isn't it time to start considering a small raise? BTC has been crashing, yet the payments remain the same (im saying this for all campaings, not blaming this one). I know its a competitive market and all that but if the price just keeps crashing, someone has to start taking the lead in raising rates, otherwise sig campaings are going to start becoming faucets 2.0.
And everyone running a signature campaing that isn't automating their process needs to get with the time. Glad this one is one of the first after Bitmixer.
As for posts quality, sometimes small one sentence posts can be great, while other people shit literally bricks but aren't all that great. For me it's relative. Of course the people posting 100 times a day need to calm the hell down.
And everyone running a signature campaing that isn't automating their process needs to get with the time. Glad this one is one of the first after Bitmixer.
As for posts quality, sometimes small one sentence posts can be great, while other people shit literally bricks but aren't all that great. For me it's relative. Of course the people posting 100 times a day need to calm the hell down.
I agree. It's clear we are going to be stuck on this low (and getting lower?) price for a long time now. This is good news for anyone that is in the long term and understand BTC enough to know what's up. We can make more BTC off sig campaings and reaps the benefits later (since if the price was 1K, we would get paid way less BTC).
Im just hoping, as soon as Bit-x can deal with a raise, please do, and the rest should follow as well, im sure it will happen and payments will start getting raised, and if no signature campaing does it the users should force them to do it.
bit-x has a reason to apply such fee actually, they are paying numerous member a tons of bitcoin, they can't go too low with fee for that reason
and that bit2me seems to shady, they are providing only espagnol language.... i prefer circle to be honest
bit2me is great because has 0 commision to extract btc over local ATM.. of course for now its only for spain unfortunately, but they are new so. I hope it reaches my country, right now I cant get instant fiat off an ATM.and that bit2me seems to shady, they are providing only espagnol language.... i prefer circle to be honest
Re: The next bubble could well surprise even the early traders...
Yes I think at least a considerable amount of those coins are not liquidated. That doesn't change the fact that a considerable amount of those coins are being sold every day. My point is that if miners would get only 3.125 bitcoins for a block then the price of a single bitcoin would be much higher than what it is today. You can say it's because of miners' selling or that it isn't but the price would without doubt be higher. Basic supply and demand logic, you can't argue that.
Yeah, sure, I don't disagree that this is definitely putting more pressure on the price than when there weren't any coins being mined every day. That's also the reason why everyone is waiting for the block reward halving. The supply isn't new, though. And never underestimate speculation.
You heard it here first.
There is some serious panic going on in relevant channels.
You want to get out at this point, maybe get back in slightly under 200 for a small bounce.
lol at trying to spread more fear to get the price down because your shitty 160 prediction by april 14th is about to fail.There is some serious panic going on in relevant channels.
You want to get out at this point, maybe get back in slightly under 200 for a small bounce.