Quote from: tsik on June 03, 2017, 06:17:08 PM

Quote from: hurr1cane on June 03, 2017, 03:21:39 AM

I have 76k of onecoin sha256_triple coins, I like the original oc header picture, stay with it, and if your going to change the name, it should represent the algorithm as superior, like ocSHA256_triple, {{oc on bittrex is orangecoin}}

im a DOS_5.0 kind of guy, so I have no interest in compilations in Linux, or group chitchat of compiling.

CHUCK NORRIS DOESNT DO PUSHUPS, HE PUSHES THE EARTH DOWN

I'd say we stick with OC, because:

a) staysecure paid for block explorer hosting

b) he already got logocreator to redo the logo

c) oc on bittrex is a long forgotten story and it's been delisted

I agree with you and I see your point. There has been taken too many steps for a radical name change at this point.
But OneCoin's biggest drawback is the name, there is way to much bad press surrounding "onecoin". A simple Google search will result in many pages of negative press by a previous coin named with the same name.

Logocreator made an awesome logo! I think the natural thing to do would be to call it 1oc as it says in the logo - because I think OC is too broad and may get confused with other things.

FattyVegan

Posts

Merits