Quote from: merv77 on November 21, 2013, 03:13:30 PM

Quote from: ferskvare on November 21, 2013, 02:22:42 PM

Quote from: Duffer1 on November 21, 2013, 11:50:08 AM

Quote from: Bitcycle on November 21, 2013, 11:16:19 AM

Well, the auction absolutely should have been shared with the general shareholder community.

While not quite a certain thing, the auction does offer strong circumstantial evidence that Alberto never had working Labcoin chips. That's crucial information to shareholders.

Some have been holding out hope that Alberto was making a genuine effort and may return with hashing later. The auction indicates that's very, very unlikely.

Everyone has a right to know that, while shares are still able to be traded.

You're right. I was talking to anyone who contacted the seller on Ebay, which caused the de-listing, which screwed our effort to capitalize on the opportunity to see justice within our lifetime.

This could have been a slam dunk 100% guaranteed fraud arrest within the week.

In what universe would this have been a slam dunk fraud arrest? An italian dude selling from italy, and you would have who exactly arrest him, on what grounds? Your amazing trail of evidence is where? Some of you nimwits have been watching way too much american TV.

I would have bought them on COD arrangement and busted him selling property which wasn't authorized by share holders. I'm sure police would be interested and bring him in for questioning and at least they have something on him.

But the ship has sailed now. and realistically it would never have work if we keep discussing these findings here. Shit it's like some here are watching his back.

Again, how would you prove that the merchandise had anything to do with Labcoin at all?

ferskvare

Posts

Merits