Quote from: ph4nt0m on January 15, 2016, 05:21:48 AM

Quote from: RoyalSands on January 15, 2016, 05:13:02 AM

Quote from: ph4nt0m on January 15, 2016, 05:10:44 AM

Quote from: Spoetnik on January 15, 2016, 05:01:43 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on January 15, 2016, 04:18:39 AM

Quote from: BobLawblaw on January 15, 2016, 04:14:58 AM

Quote from: craptsy_sucks on January 15, 2016, 03:41:17 AM

New update!!
http://blog.cryptsy.com/post/137323646202/annoucement

Show of hands ? How many people are genuinely surprised ?

About time they came clean.

I am a bit surprised how utterly idiotic this is. Poor security practices, trying to conceal huge loss, letting the site bomb completely before coming clean... but yeah, a hack was something most predicted.

Ya like he takes a pre-compiled LuckCoin wallet and runs it on his machine with ties to millions in customer funds ?
Further more i already heard waaaay back that they have to compile the wallets themselves so that has to be a lie !

No real exchange runs precompiled wallets. First, they use Linux for backends. Windows is plain insecure. Second, to fire up a wallet released by an unknown dev without a code review? Never going to happen.

If Mullick reviewed the code on every wallet then he was one fast motherfucker.

He was a slow one actually. However he didn't need to do a complete review on every wallet update. He only needed to browse though those last commits. Look at that shitcoin:

https://github.com/alerj78/lucky7coin/commits/master

Two last ones are harmless, however "Import lucky7coin" is fishy. Not a fork, not a rebase, just an import of who knows what. If they let it in, they were idiots in crypto business.

hmm interesting. r u Patrick?

RoyalSands

Posts

Merits