Quote from: shinjikun on October 26, 2017, 12:38:01 PM

Quote from: eXpl0sive on October 26, 2017, 12:14:31 PM

Quote from: fragout on October 25, 2017, 06:40:45 PM

Quote from: rjclarke2000 on October 25, 2017, 06:33:00 PM

I'm happy to be proved wrong here but this is how I feel about the forks...

BCH - sold pretty much all straight away and did extremely well out of it and boosted my btc holdings.

Bgold - looks like it could be a waste of time and worth nothing more than a couple of potatoes each + no replay protection

2x - a real spanner in the works, no replay protection and creates yet more FUD and confusion on exchanges.

Personally I want the forks to fork off. I am slightly worried about doing anything with these coins due to the lack of replay protection which potentially could jeopardise my btc.

This Bgold smells fishy to me. From the very beginning when they released their copy and paste website put together by a dyslexic 7 year old. I'm not even going to take the language barrier as an excuse. If you are going to release something like this then start by making a decent web page.

Does everyone think the 2X fork will actually go ahead now that jeff garzik will be concentrating on his wondercoin and the fact that the 2x futures are now trading at $130~?

If B2X doesn't happen, how will the exchanges cope with the customers who bought it in exchange of their BTC? Will the trades be reversed?

(This may very well be applicable to BTG too)

If the fork doesn't happen BT2 will have a value of 0 and you will get simply nothing.
The one how bougth this shit have only lose the gamble.

Is it the same for bitcoingold ? Do we have only "future" of bitcoingold now ? I thought that if we had "fake/imaginary" bitcoin gold coins, the website coinmarketcap should list it as "future".

Goddess78

Posts

Merits