Quote from: julerz12 on June 09, 2018, 03:01:50 AM

This happens in most bounty campaigns. When I was managing OPUS they did the same thing.
After finalizing the spreadsheet and handed it out to them, they think it's really unreasonable for bounty participants to get equal or even higher amount of tokens than their investors and decided to cut in half the bounty pool.

Huh, why they're too stupid, if they can't pay them(bounty hunters) why they make unreasonable bounty pool like $1M or similar shits? That's why they(dev) need to think about bounty allocation? Or maybe it's because they want to make bounty hunters interested?

Quote from: remol on June 09, 2018, 11:57:24 AM

Quote from: tahmad on June 08, 2018, 12:35:32 PM

Quote from: remol on June 08, 2018, 09:03:37 AM

~

Yes, and please stop spreading nonsense words to increase your post activity

Please go get an english teacher or go buy glasses to read better. I'm just complaining like you about the 10x bounty payment reduction.

No, I'm fully understand about what you wanted to say.. And actually you just spreading stupid shit, and we don't need it.... Your post is more like:

"I was initially very enthusiastic with this exchange. Still little, but seemed promising." << this is just a stale speech!!

"Now that they want to reduce by almost 10x our BPS payment for the hard work delivered, I'm totally losing confidence with this project. What will they do once they grow up, to their customers...?" << it's more like: ouch sorry for your lose, but I'm also victim on this case... Another shit: you said that bounty pool was reduced by 10x, can you count it correctly? Because from $1M to $687.5k it's mean that bounty pool reduced by ±1.45x not 10x !!!!

tahmad

Posts

Merits