Quote from: hppcoin on January 03, 2018, 08:33:27 AM

Quote from: hppcoin on January 03, 2018, 08:05:09 AM

Quote from: mrzeta on January 03, 2018, 05:42:45 AM

16*16*16 Its too hard for GPU . The current situation is not very good for HPP to move forward,And now the rules of output are more fixed, what do you feel?

Hi Mrzeta,
The choice of Lyra Matrix with 16 Cols, 16 Rows and 16 TimeCost was made with concertation of all Dev Team, we have done a lot of test using multiple parameters combinations, finally we come up with 16*16 and 16 for TimeCost.
The Goal is to have Egalitarian Mining 1:1 CPU:GPU.

Best Regards
Ramlin
HPP Team

A Hard Fork is Planned for the 25 February 2018 (less than 2 months) to activate Masternodes. we will create a voting form soon, and the community will decide to promote CPU over GPU or GPU over CPU or Egalitarian Mining.

Best Regards
HPP Team

How about you guys implement Multi-Hash Mining?

"Multi-hash mining is our solution for aligning incentives between miners and users of the Zen Protocol. For each block, a miner can choose between one of several hash functions to use, each with its own difficulty. The Protocol has a target ratio between the blocks mined using these functions. If too many blocks are mined using a particular function, then its difficulty increases, reducing the efficiency of mining with that function. Token holders vote to adjust the target ratio, providing feedback on how they want the blockchain to be secured.

This gives miners the strong incentive to do what token holders want, because switching between different hash functions is usually quite expensive for the miner, particularly when using specialized hardware. On the other hand, token holders have no incentive to change the target ratio, provided miners are acting in their interests and the blockchain is being secured."

sources:

https://www.zenprotocol.com/en/faq

https://www.zenprotocol.com/files/multi_hash_mining.pdf

usr64

Posts

Merits