Quote from: rdbase on Today at 01:53:02 PM

Quote from: nomachine on Today at 09:03:12 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on Today at 08:30:01 AM

If it was a continuation of Satoshi's thoughts posted mistakenly using another account, then it would have been mere minutes apart, no?

This is just sloppy journalism. Sensationalism. Crafting narratives that lack any real evidence. It’s an attempt to draw connections where none exist, cobbling together theories from irrelevant details and presenting them as facts.

Even Martin Shkreli believes it is Todd. Roll Eyes

https://x.com/MartinShkreli/status/1843848001007300629

This is from defenders of Sam Bankman Fried actions who believed Roger Ver is Bitcoin Jesus yet got arrested in Spain for tax evasion in the States.

"Following Tuesday night's release, former Bitcoin Core developer Gregory Maxwell pointed out an overlooked detail undermining filmmaker Cullen Hoback's case that Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator is another early Bitcoin developer, Peter Todd."
source: https://www.theblock.co/post/320241/hbo-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin-peter-todd

Along with the narrative of Satoshi 'mistake of posting from PeterTodd's account' theory.
There was this cryptic message from Todd's chat log once decyphered with their writing styles to be similar can be evidence enough to deem them the same person? I would disagree.

https://x.com/Cointelegraph/status/1843910047103103388

With all due respect to Martin Shkreli, he doesn't have the slightest clue what he's talking about. He's had zero historical involvement with cryptocurrency.

Bitcoins101

Posts

Merits