Quote from: jimmothy on February 14, 2014, 01:08:27 AM

Quote from: Bluebark on February 14, 2014, 01:00:38 AM

Quote from: goozman96 on February 14, 2014, 12:05:03 AM

They basically said exactly what BA had been telling us. If that would be a violation of the NDA, then BA would have been in violation of it a long time ago. Specifics about the deal are under NDA most likely, not broad facts that BA has been telling us this whole time (ie 28nm ASIC being made by verisilicon and globalfoundries)

Yes, I understand...but that does not detract from standard corporate policy of...keeping you mouth shut. BA can say all they want...it's their Tech. But Veri is under an NDA and That email blows it right out of the water. Think about it. How long do you think a company that handles other company's proprietary technology under NDAs would last if they had employees that talked to general population about said technology?

It doesn't make sense...IMO

Handing out proprietary technology =/= Confirming a non-secretive contract with a company

First, what I said was "handles other company's proprietary technology". I did not say "Handing out proprietary technology"...there is a difference even my feeble mind can understand. But regardless of my previous statement, NDAs mean you keep your Mouth Shut...Non Disclosure Agreement....what part of that is hard to understand?

And that is why i do not trust that email from Veri.

Bluebark

Posts

Merits