Quote from: phzi on March 19, 2014, 05:02:14 AM

Quote from: comeonalready on March 19, 2014, 01:19:00 AM

So that would mean you were one of the miners who were taking up to 10% more of your fair share of profits from the pool, however unknowingly.

Oh, I knew what I was doing by cranking my miners the way I did - but as I said, I have discovered many blocks for WafflePool, and a rare few were orphans.

Quote from: comeonalready on March 19, 2014, 01:19:00 AM

For the others who had their equipment tuned correctly for mining almost anywhere else than wafflepool, they were receiving up to 10% less of profits directly due to their efforts, depending upon the ratio of efficient to inefficient miners in the pool. The actual percentages depend upon whether wafflepool was actually a pool of fools, and only poolwaffle knows that as he is the only one with access to the relevant statistics.

Ya... I still think that was one of the best parts about wafflepool - haha.

Quote from: comeonalready on March 19, 2014, 01:19:00 AM

I too would be very curious about sfire's 20GH/s mining efficiency prior to the server changeover, which I consider to be a very welcome one. Ironically, depending upon that statistic, it might not have been the largest miner that was keeping us from efficiently mining the lowest difficult coins, but the smaller miners instead!

Indeed.

--

I am getting around 2.5% average reject rate now after re-tuning for the new reject profile.

Looks like the new stratum server is costing me overall about 2% in decreased hashrate, and 2% additional rejects (very short sample period so far, mind you)

Guess this was the point of these changes. Not overly pleased myself.

So you're seriously bummed out getting 2.5% rejects? Even though the server changes help your profitability overall?

Dishes

Posts

Merits