Quote from: ocminer on August 26, 2014, 04:54:23 PM

Quote from: OPTiK on August 26, 2014, 04:17:17 PM

Quote from: becalmerill on August 26, 2014, 03:42:23 PM

Quote from: OPTiK on August 26, 2014, 03:17:48 PM

Quote from: twoturtles on August 26, 2014, 03:15:18 PM

Quote from: sandzja on August 26, 2014, 03:05:16 PM

Hi! Sorry if that's already answered earlier - but what's wrong (if there is something wrong with it at all) with the difficulty right now for X11 mining (2M right now)?

Hey,

   Here's what I'm seeing for diff:

   "difficulty" : 1645273.05459579,
   "difficulty_sha256d" : 1645273.05459579,
   "difficulty_x11" : 9.94648202,

Where do you see X11's at 2 million?

   Best regards,

syntaks

https://neosx11.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool

Just saw it myself, suprnova seems like the best x11 pool too, I don't trust HashHarder after seeing some complaints on their thread they haven't responded to.

On the contrary, I don't trust suprnova's stats. They are jacked up.

From the site:

General Statistics
Pool Hash Rate   171.575 MH/s
Pool Efficiency   96.70%
Current Active Workers   13
Current Difficulty   356,568.79347192
Est. Next Difficulty   0.00000000 (Change in 1 Blocks)
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Network)   425403140760 hours 1 minute 14 seconds
Est. Avg. Time per Round (Pool)   2479 hours 24 minutes 2 seconds
Est. Shares this Round   91,281,611 (done: 0.29%)
Next Network Block   777 (Current: 776)
Last Block Found   0
Time Since Last Block   zero seconds

Those don't look like X11 stats. And I have received payout from HashHarder. Also, they are a bit slow to respond, but they do eventually.

I agree with you lol. Looks like hashlink.eu fixed their wallet, I may go mine there.

Check again, fixed

Thanks, much better now.

sandzja

Posts

Merits