Quote from: Mpamaegbu on Today at 04:34:12 PM

Quote from: joker_josue on Today at 03:36:13 PM

Quote from: Mpamaegbu on Today at 12:30:36 PM

~snipped~

If the same neutral tag says that the user makes a low-quality post just to meet objectives, it can influence the campaign managers' choices.

Fine and good.

However, what beggars explanation is why would a campaign manager accept a user who already had a neutral tag into their campaign but thereafter ask the user to find a way to get it removed? Why not reject the user in the first place? That's the supposed case with OP or that which I alluded to. If from the outset a user is rejected based on a tag, I don't think it will be much of an issue like what is being discussed now.

It's a case of I made a mistake it should have been this rule and the participant is the victim here, the managers should just let the campaign finish, and implement it on the manager's next campaign unless the campaign will last for years like the campaigns Hhampuz is managing but is it on the campaign rules that those with tagged need not apply because they will not get accepted in the campaign.
There are campaigns that specify that there should be this number of merits before you apply, some still apply and leave at the discretion of the manager because they believe they are qualified on the other requirements and let the manager decide if they are qualified or not.

taguig

Posts

Merits