Quote from: Yatsan on November 22, 2019, 03:55:27 AM

Quote from: 2weent6 on November 22, 2019, 03:51:10 AM

Quote from: Veleor on November 13, 2019, 11:05:12 PM

One member, which received more than 100 merit in the art contest topic, wrote that he took the "base image" from another website, but at the same time his nickname is specified on the picture.
I suppose, this can make a confusion that this user painted most of the image.

Post in the art contest topic:

Quote from: Laskoo on October 19, 2019, 06:19:30 AM

3L1NEFH3VZNGb37jvuSpfKXRYgPuhkExD2

Happy 10th anniversary community!

Credits: freedommag.org for the base image.

Original picture:

Quote from: https://www.freedommag.org/special-reports/new-yorker/caption-the-cartoon/the-last-supper.html

same with this guy, received a huge amount of merit.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193860.msg52803489#msg52803489

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Girl-with-a-Pearl-Earring-by-Vermeer

Put an effort on making a new art, but its not fair to use almost the same image with a different EARING! This is still a form of plagiarism for me.

HAHAHA, That is contemporary art sir, making a copy of original painting with different interpretation. 🙂 same with starry night of van gogh a lot of different version from other artist. It's started from scratch and painted from nothing. That's not plagiarism, if for you that is plagiarism okay, but with regards to the rule of art it is not. Thankyou again. And please study art first before accusing someone like that. Thankyou.

The guy above use the image with different interpretation, yet received a negative trut simply because its plagiarism same as you did, now tell me the difference?
You didnt even acknowledge the original art. Well, its all up to them whether to accept this art or not.

2weent6

Posts

Merits