Quote from: MasterMined710 on June 01, 2017, 06:34:51 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on June 01, 2017, 01:38:46 AM

Quote from: MasterMined710 on May 31, 2017, 06:03:45 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on May 31, 2017, 05:17:54 PM

Quote from: afbitcoins on May 31, 2017, 12:21:37 PM

Quote from: Lukas_Jackson on May 31, 2017, 11:29:24 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on May 31, 2017, 05:20:45 AM

Quote from: san2ok on May 30, 2017, 12:33:50 PM

total supply of dash coin fixed?

~~According to Evan, nothing in Dash is fixed. He may change the total supply any time he wants to. It's already happened once.~~

Just to let you know, your beloved Evan is not core dev anymore Roll Eyes

. Shocked? He is more like consultant/advisor now. Dash have 18 Shocked

full-time developers, all paid from the blockchain, so your three years old FUD bus factor 1 is in the bin Kiss

. Also there are ~4500 masternodes ready to vote for any changes.

BTW you sound tired. I assume that trying to convince people that 80% anonymous, Pump&Dump, fluffyretardo, cultish, scammy coin-xmr is a cool coin, is very tiring Cheesy

Maybe Icebreaker wasn't 'in' on fluffyponys recent scam. Poor Icey, yes probably needs a holiday

It's rather telling you all would rather discuss me rather than, ~~given the fact Evan alters emission at will, admit Dash has no reliably/provably fixed supply.~~

Any changes to Dash will be voted on by the masternodes. The coin supply is fixed and will not be changing. No changes that would damage the coins value would get voted in by the masternodes.

The masternodes "voted" for 2MB blocks, yet there is still no fix for the quadratic verification issue and thus the change hasn't been coded/tested/deployed.

Dash's "vote" for 2MB was merely an exercise in Governance Theater, with no actual purpose other than a creating a brief opportunity to sneer at Bitcoin and pump Dash as a viable alternative.

The Masternodes did *NOT* vote on the Darkcoin to Dash rebrand.

We don't need 2MB blocks yet, when we do they will be implemented without controversy, unlike other coins that lack governance.

Darkcoin was re-branded to Dash before masternodes existed, we had a full debate about it though.

I have to agree with the others that your level of trolling has declined in recent months, please get it together. We need you at your best to keep the thread bumped and create controversy so we can remain the number one ANN thread on BTCtalk. Kiss

I'm going to concur with what MM said, and go one step further. Dash has a real development team who are doing real work to push forward a real change in the usability and decentralization of cryptocurrency (Dash Evolution). For our dev team, it's a matter of priorities. Sure, they could code the 2 MB blocks and spend a few weeks shepherding us through the fork, but why do so when we don't need to? Unlike some coins, who have to adopt tech that they don't need just to get some good press, Dash continues to develop real features that will take us to the top...in the long run.

Yes, if we had implemented 2 MB blocks that same month, we probably would have gotten a little price pump from it. Yes, if we had been the first coin to implement SegWit, we probably would have gotten a little price pump from it. The difference between us and other coins is that when we don't need things, we don't implement them just to get some temporary media attention and price action. From my interactions with the team, they work just as hard today as they did when Dash was $4, and will work just as hard when Dash is $500.

You want short term profits? Find coins that implement features that are unneeded just to get a pump. You want long-term value? You'll find it in Dash.

ddink7

Posts

Merits