Quote from: ICO INVESTOR on December 23, 2017, 09:04:25 PM

Quote from: eastgrand on December 23, 2017, 08:33:36 PM

Quote from: Rusty_1993 on December 23, 2017, 07:40:56 AM

Here is a little food for thought.......

In the near future, I fear a potential lawsuitcoming our way because of the name of our coin, should we consider a re-branding ? I seems like the name is too similar to the name OmiseGo, and as far as I know this coin is not associated with that coin at all. This, to me, seems like it will likely cause problems down the road. I also worry that it will cause confusion to the newcomers or onlookers so an original name and logo seems essential to success down the road, especially if we hit big exchanges!

Something to think about, anyone else have an opinion on this matter? Please let the community know.

I don't think that's really an issue. We see so many other coins with the name of another coin and then classic. That sets precedence.

well we have ethereum and ethereum classic

yes but ethereum classic is forked from ethereum. There is a connection. Our coin doesn't have that. Besides that OmiseGo is a ERC20 token...

Rusty_1993

Posts

Merits