Quote from: pbremen01 on July 06, 2014, 04:35:35 AM

Quote from: Megalodon on July 06, 2014, 02:00:31 AM

Quote from: pbremen01 on July 05, 2014, 06:27:06 PM

Questions to the community members:

Who is willing to donate bitcoins to MindFox to publish some kind of updated whitepaper?

Who is willing to donate bitcoins to MindFox to develop anonymity feature?

Who is willing to donate bitcoins to other devs to develop some other (less important) features (Commander)?

Who is willing to stop fudding and leave this thread instead of trying to lower price so their buy orders get filled? Why else are you here to fud? Because you don't like pump and dumps? You must not like bitcoin or any kind of cryptocurrency then. If you want to protect people from pump and dumps, go start an occupy wall street protest and show the world how naive you are about capitalism and the free market.

I think that you're not perceiving my posts correctly. You perceive them them as "anti-cryptcoin". But they are actually "pro-cryptcoin". Cryptcoin has extremely "secret" and non-transparent development. My opinion is that development (especially of anonymous features) needs to be open and transparent. This is the goal of my posts and I think that this can be very positive for cryptcoin.

Quite large number of widely used security solutions (PGP, tor, OpenSSL etc.) are developed in very open and transparent way.

I have no problem with pumps & dumps. It is not my job to protect people from pump & dumps.

But I have problems when people start abusing "anonymity features" (for example, claiming that something is anonymous but in reality it is not). This may have consequences that are far worse than people losing majority of their money in "bad investments".

Do you understand the concept of flogging a dead horse? Your straw man arguments are running a bit thin.

Devs have stated that they would like to keep their concept for "hard to trace" features private until it has been implemented. This is to prevent the idea from being stolen by some random crypto punk (every time I hear your argument for transparency in development this is what comes to mind)
Comparing development of PGP or OpenSSL to a cryptocurrency? GTFO
Mindfox never has and never will speak of "true anonymity" through the current implementation of the Bitcoin protocol.

I don't always throw all my eggs in one basket, but when I do, it's because Mindfox promises to deliver his best shot at creating an "anonymous" coin. Hell he's so honest he won't even call it that himself because he know's it's not possible.

PB dumbass go spread FUD about coins that outright lie about being anonymous. If you're so concerned with fighting a war against "bad investments" or dishonest development of said feature. This is the first coin that actually had the balls to come out and say that true anonymity is impossible and the best we can hope for is "very hard to trace". If your gripe is with a coin showing no transparency in their development of something they claim to be anonymous, it surely must lie with coins other than Crypt, as Mindfox has never claimed anonymity. Although I seriously doubt that's where your true issue with Crypt lies. Don't bother responding to this either, as you're now on my blocked list.

knightlife999: Keep up the great work poking holes in these ludicrous claims, I had to throw my 2 crypt in Cheesy

NRD

Posts

Merits