Quote from: Betcoin.AG on November 11, 2020, 08:12:38 PM

We are aware of the player's complaint, as he threatened earlier he would make said complaint unless he received a bonus. To clarify, the player is upset because his wager was accepted prior to action taking place which was negative for his side and he believes it would not have been accepted had the action worked in his favor. As we explained to him, he received the exact wager he attempted and we cannot refund a bet based on his speculation that it would have worked out differently had a different action occurred. It is interesting that the player mentions Stake, because if you search the forums they have been accused of this same thing, as has every sportsbook with continuous live betting offered, usually by a player who is not clear on how it is supposed to operate. That said, Stake is a great site and we encourage him to play where he has the best experience.

As always, we strongly encourage anyone with experience with our live betting platform to share their feedback, as well. Thanks and best of luck to all!

Now I am not siding with the player against betcoin.ag, for the simple reason in all of the firms I have bet with and I have 20 years experience of inplay with hundreds of firms, none have ever done this.

Having said that the answer above is rubbish and the lack of clarity as to what should happen is pitiful.

What is the norm(and should have been explained) is that when a bet is submitted the delay kicks in, if no event occurs in this delay time(advantaging EITHER TEAM) then the bet is good and valid.

If the Op has his facts right then it is fraud, but for me I do not think a firm would do this.
A lot easier to just not pay winners, as many firms do(no aspirations on (Betcoin.ag)

Intrepidity

Posts

Merits