Quote from: shasan on Today at 05:46:40 PM

It is correct that the user has won the game and the amount is not a smalll but it will not be a wise decision that the gambling site detectrd multiple accounts and that is prohibited. Inbthis case you cant say about any legitamacy while the entire procedure is in question.

Let me spell it out — again:

The guy wins $1.5 million — legit, clean, no exploits — and instead of focusing on that, we’ve got people bringing up the fact that he did time in Indonesia like this is some courtroom drama. What’s next, are we gonna subpoena his high school teachers to see if he cheated on a math test in 2004?

This is textbook character assassination. You can’t disprove the win, you can’t prove he cheated, so now the goal is to paint him as a “bad person” to make everyone feel like he doesn’t deserve the money. It’s transparent, it’s pathetic, and frankly, it reeks of desperation.

And let’s not pretend the “multiple accounts” thing is anything more than a fig leaf. The extra account(s) weren’t used to gamble, claim bonuses, or manipulate anything. They were inactive. Period. Maybe he’s bad with emails, or tech in general — big crime, I know. Let’s burn him at the stake for being digitally clumsy.

The win happened on a single, verified account. No foul play. No edge taken. Just a casino scrambling to protect itself from a massive payout — and weaponizing a minor technicality to do it.

If he’d won a hundred bucks, no one would care about the second account. But $1.5 million? Suddenly everyone’s a TOS expert and a moral judge.

And of course, we’ve got the usual suspects like holydarkness doing their unpaid intern routine for the casino. If you think this is a righteous stand for “the rules,” and not just an excuse to screw a big winner, I’ve got some magic beans to sell you.

This isn’t enforcement. This is corporate damage control hiding behind a smear campaign.

CreepyUncleJoe

Posts

Merits