Quote from: Vlad2Vlad on June 02, 2014, 07:58:33 PM

Wrong on all counts - I already considered everything you have posted [and more] before I cast my vote.

I have an Econ degree and I understand what deflation does - it is as bad, long term, as inflation [for the poor].

The 2 economists you quoted are 100% right.

And BTW: Bitcoin is deflationary in that it has a fixed amount of coins [for now]. Valuations look at that and not at just the fact there's new coins being minted [temporarily].

IDEALY [in the long run] it's best to have a small nominal inflation strategy, like 1%-3%, this is ideal and correct.

My rationale does not come from selfishness, I could easily then vote for a 10% PoS and get richer than everyone else - this is exactly what bankers do, this is what the fed and the elite do a it is a stealth tax on the poor and middle class, and I have no intention of doing that, LONG TERM.

I'm simply thinking about what will lead to the quickest mass adoption path. And that is: To be as close to the standard, which is Bitcoin, as possible.

This is our biggest advantage against the hundreds [and soon thousands] of other alt-coins.
If we advertise ourselves as Bitcoin's twin, it would be a lie if we were actually printing more coins beyond the 21 million hardcap, and that is one of Bitcoin's biggest selling point against the hate people have for Fiat.

And you suggest it's a good idea to give that massive advantage away. NEVER!

Bitcoin will inflate, they will add PoS, the 21 million hard cap will be raised, I've said this since last year, but for now they have not and neither will we, UNLESS it is absolutely necessary to keep the miners going, and in this case, given we have CEX on our board, it is NOT necessary.

None of what you have written makes any sense, its utter nonsense and you are being blinded by your ego.

You are comparing yourself to Milton Friedman? 2 economists? "They" are 100% right and you want to ignore Friedman?

Bitcoin is in its inflationary period, 21 million coins will not be minted until ~2040. You are very confused.

This supposed hard cap on bitcoin is its flaw. You want to be left with only CEX mining? Have you gone mad?

Frictionless is 100% right though I won't beg.

It is not a decision that has to be made now, but since frictionless mentioned it, i thought would
add me and MILTON FRIEDMAN (1 economist, winner of Nobel Prize in Economics) to the mix.

Quote from: FrictionlessCoin on June 02, 2014, 08:22:28 PM

Okay... if you got Jeffrey's word that IXC will not be pulled with zero subsidy. You have better be 100% certain about this.

I am perfectly fine with this scenario. Of course, it's just really weird that a single pool controls 100% of the coin.

Ya there was not a lot of discussion when GHASH.IO was about to takeover 51% of BTC around the net. Community would
be quite happy to see IXC get 100%... That is one way to drive it to 0.00000001 satoshi pretty fast assuming that is your goal?

cryptos

Posts

Merits