Quote from: yahoo62278 on June 11, 2022, 05:58:29 AM

Quote

Question One
Who decides the amount to pay participants according to ranks?
The company or the manager. Because some campaigns pay a certain rank higher and some pay same rank lower even if they have almost same budget.

The decision on how much to pay is up to the company, but most let the manager make the rates according to the weekly budget. It also depends on how many users the company wants to hire. 1 company may be ok with 20 users and a $2000 weekly budget whereas another company wants more exposure on the forum and they want 50 users with a $2000 weekly budget. That's why you see a difference in pay per rank.

Quote

Question Two
Who decides the ranks to hire, and why such decisions?
I ask because I have seen managers like yahoo62278 and Royse777 hire member ranks. Could the reason for the decision be to encourage low rank members or they discovered that low rank members have more zeal to work.

The company and manager discuss the advantages of which ranks to hire. I like to let companies get a few extra users for cheap even though they cannot wear an avatar. At the same time it makes users not feel like its gonna be 100 years before they reach full member rank.

Since the introduction of the merit system, users feel like it takes forever to earn enough merits for the full member rank(which is not true if you're a decent poster).

Quote

Question Three
How do the companies that launch campaigns here make money? Is there any kind of SEO embedded in the signature that indexes their sites in search engines?

Think about it man.

Quote

Question Four
Having 10 quality posters making a total of 100 quality posts a week and having 20 shit posters making 500 shit posts per week, which one produces more result for the company.

I ask because I have seen company like Fortunejack paying members $100 to make 20 posts, ChipMixer paying members $300 to make 50 posts. But a company like Stake.com will have to make a user post like 80 to 90 posts to get $100. (I do not mean that stake members posts shits). Just to buttress my question.

The definition of "shit post" varies from manager to manager. Even users in chipmixer are shitposters at times.(yea I said that) Some people believe that the more a companies name is seen, the better it is for the company. Some believe the more well known names a company hires the better it is for said company. Some just want their name to be seen some on the forum but cannot afford thousands per week for months.

I personally feel like asking for 80-90 posts per week is a bit much. Even 50 is a bit much. Companies should be happy with 20-25. Allowing more then that just invites users to post spam to get more pay. Seems like when a company wants a large quota, people suddenly have an opinion about everything. Lower the quota they're allowed and magically most who had opinions on everything chill out.

It's also worth it to mention that these companies that allow a user to post a large amount of posts weekly, do not force a user to max out. They hope that users post like normal and offer quality, but cannot do anything but remove a spammer if they deem a user is spamming for pay.

Quote

Question Five
Some managers do not require number of merits earned in applying in their campaign while many require.
Is merit no longer the measure for quality?

Getting merit IMO means nothing. You can buy that shit if you look hard enough.(I have never bought a merit for the record) Some managers like to use it as a requirement to stay in the campaign, maybe they feel it makes them look better or users are good posters. I think NOT.

Quote

Question six
Is it a crime in the forum that after applying for a campaign, the user sends the campaign manager pm to give the manager more reasons to hire him. Which he cannot do in the application thread in order not to destruct the application process.

You pm me asking for a slot and i'll use that as my reason to not hire you, unless you are someone well known on the forum. You apply like everyone else and wait to see if you got in.

Managers all have a different opinion on this.

Quote

Question seven
Post Bursting!
If user A makes 3 posts per day for 7 days, that will be 21 posts. User B makes 10 posts per day for the last 3 days of the week, making it 30 posts. Who among them is beneficial to the company they promote and why?

Burstposting!!!!!! If you are a user that makes 3 posts a day for 7 days and make those 3 posts in 1 minute per day, depending on the content i'll likely allow it. You might be a user in a shit area with spotty internet or some other restriction, so I try to sympathize. Now, if you are a fucking shithead who makes their quota in 2 days spamming the discussion boards 5 minutes a day with 25 posts, i'll remove you from a campaign in a heartbeat and pay you 0.

It's obvious who burstposts trying to get paid, or has multiple accounts with quotas to meet each week. I'm sorry if you have shitty life circumstances, but this forum is not your bank where you need 20 accounts in a sig campaign each week.

Quote

Question eight
Is there a rule that says a user must wait for such amount of time after making a post in order to make another. If yes, why?

There is no written rule, but most managers like to see a gap in posting. (This ties in with burstposting as well) If you are in a campaign and you make all your posts in 1 day(lets say everyone made all their posts in the 1st day of the week), what happens to the advertisement you are wearing? The answer is IT DISAPPEARS TO PAGE 5 IN 1 DAY, because all these other companies have users replying in the same threads you posted in and noone will see that ad til the next week. Basically the company just wasted their money for 1 day of advertising and 6 days of dead time.

Quote

Question nine
Are there boards that gives more result to companies and are there boards that doesn't give results at all.
I ask because;
Best_Change doest like posts in gambling.
Yahoo62278 doesn't like posts in Beginners and Help board.
Some campaigns don't want posts in local board.
Some doesn't like Altcoin boards.
Some doesn't accept Politics and society.
Why this discrepancy?

This is solely at the managers discretion. Companies make some rules and some companies just trust the manager. I should probably remove the beginners and help restriction because that board is bitcoiners helping other bitcoiners. I have seriously considered banning the trading discussion board, bitcoin discussion board, gambling discussion board, and altcoin boards as I fell that's where most of your spammers are located, but I will not be that strict.

Hopefully this answers most of your questions. If my responses pissed anyone off, shit happens. I gave what I think are honest answers.

sir yahoo, is this ok for you to make so many curses? your so angry but now your a married man getting some p*ssy. do not be so angry it it is not so good for your health and we need you alive and good sir!!!

i am using a alt accout so Sir Yahoo dont removes me from siganature campaign

Cault46one

Posts

Merits