Quote from: djm34 on July 31, 2014, 11:36:17 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on July 30, 2014, 01:01:26 AM

Quote from: SpeedDemon13 on July 30, 2014, 01:00:55 AM

Quote from: Crypto_EX on July 29, 2014, 08:22:47 PM

Quote from: restless on July 29, 2014, 07:46:18 PM

Quote from: Crypto_EX on July 29, 2014, 07:06:18 PM

Quote from: restless on July 29, 2014, 06:17:37 PM

I think a donation fee is ok. Its fair to give developer a share, and this way everyone donates proportional to their "income".

5% is not okay though because we have electricity to pay for too ...

Why not?!
A miner which gives you 2x the speed of regular one (if any!) and you think 5% is too much?
Don't use it then.
Its a win-win for the developer AND users. Until better way to reward devs is found

we have to cover electricity costs 5% is too much and he charges that much because he knows we don't have any other option, if i'm not going to profit (electricity is 80% of my mining revenue + 5% dev fee + 2% pool fee) after paying for electricity then what is the point .....

also 2 x faster 100 x faster difficulty will normalize that when everybody starts using that miner

devfee should never be over 1 ~ 2 % as a maximum because tons of users will be using that miner and hash for him at no electricity cost so why be greedy, i mean the dev will still end with a huge amount of electricity free hashes ...

Honestly, a dev for a miner will get more at 2% or lower dev fee, because people will more likely give a donation that will surpass the 5% from the richer miners/investors. This is my opinion though.

Noooooooooope.

+1

(actually those who give aren't generally the big whale (who have to pay their electricity bill and pool fee... Grin

good one

) but rather the small users, or some coin supporters in some case... the community doesn't show a lot its appreciation... )

look u r going to defend the 5% fee and then u come here and talk oh come on even the op doesn't agree with such a high fee ... that is pure GREED period !

Crypto_EX

Posts

Merits