Quote from: info@anonibet.com on July 18, 2014, 09:50:27 AM

Quote from: powerguy on July 18, 2014, 09:44:11 AM

Quote from: BigBetRichy on July 01, 2014, 02:25:50 PM

Michael,

I understand your point. However, the fact is you were alerted to "suspicious activity" and it's been 6 days now with nothing to further bolster those claims. So the "suspicious activity" alert to halt my withdrawal was based on nothing more than me simply winning. The actions of your company demonstrate that as a fact as there hasn't been any evidence to support otherwise. This is a huge turnoff to players if your third-party providers says, "STOP!...don't pay him!...he won a lot...that's impossible...must have cheated."

If a player could indeed cheat your system (however unlikely that may be), you would think that there would be evidence to support it aside from winning. I won a decent amount fast (without cheating) and that is unacceptable for you guys. But you guys were the ones who put the double-up feature in place. You guys were the ones who decided to allow up to 5 double-ups within a single game. I've been to many casinos where they limit the double to just 1, or put a cap on how much you can win before forcing you to collect the winnings (ie., can't double over 50 credits, etc..) or disable it altogether. If you don't like the risk you took by having your game allow 5 double-ups with no credit cap, then change it. It's gambling, sometimes you guys lose too you know.

I know the allegations of me cheating will not be backed up by proof because there wasn't any cheating. I think the community will also agree with my position that having 6 days go by and have no smoking gun is enough. Again, if a player was to cheat your system then I would think after 6 days of issuing the "Alert" there would be some evidence showing exactly what they were doing, etc... All we have is the fact that I won...which is somehow synonymous with cheating and/or suspicious activity.

did you receive your winnings after all?

No he did not receive his winnings, we have not paid him. He emailed us and admitted he has manipulated the system. He came up with a proposal to get something from us, stating he is very wise and advanced on technology. He can post the email he has sent to us if he is willing to, we will not disclose his email as part of our privacy policy.

"Get something from you?" It's called a business proposal. In full disclosure to everyone, I did manipulate their game(s)...it's what I do. However, I'm still curious why you didn't address my concern over that last account I made Michael...the trap one? People probably won't understand what I'm referring to so I'll post my email and then you can answer that question. If Anonibet doesn't want my services, no problem...but they did not perform due diligence on one of the accounts I made and confiscated the deposit and winnings based upon it having the same characteristics of my other ones. Then they email me saying I manipulated the games and no funds will be withdrawn, even though I purposefully played that account legit...as a trap so to speak, to see if they will react the same way, AND THEY DID! So the email sent to me about the Casino Service Provider investigating the account and saw manipulation was a LIE. That account was played 100% legit as it was a test for them...they should pay that one out. Anyway, here is my email so everyone will know what I'm talking about:

We're having quite the cat and mouse game, huh? We can both agree you have a glaring vulnerability with your online casino. We both know that they (Casino Service Provider) do not send alerts to you warning of suspicious activity right away, if at all. At first I thought the accounts were on hold because of the exploit but soon realized it's undetectable (as evidenced by it not being fixed) and the holds are based on newly created accounts mixed in with types of games played and how fast I cashout, etc... This was easy to spot after enough cashout tests. It's apparent that if a cashout comes through with the above-mentioned characteristics it will be put on hold. Not a problem for me cause I can simply blend it in. You may think you "got me" with stopping accounts from being cashed out but you were giving me what I wanted...information. I know exactly what to do now in order to stay under the radar. As each test/account goes by I gain more and more information.

Yesterday I made a new account (kincaidsupplies@hotmail.com), played the same game (blackjack) and cashed out right away. However, this time I didn't deploy the exploit on purpose...not once. I believed so strongly that you would react the same way because it followed the same exact patterns as mentioned above minus the exploit. This was another test...to see if you can distinguish the difference between the two. For some reason you labeled that account as being used to manipulate the software and the winnings would be confiscated. But we both know it was never really looked at and nothing was found. I know this because I purposefully did not use the exploit for that account so telling me anything different would be moot. No worries though...I won't pass judgment on that based upon the adversarial nature of the business we're in.

So now that I know you guys are being way too over-reactive for any account that follows the same patterns, I have a new protocol for staying under the radar. Again, it's obvious you guys don't know where your weaknesses are and how to fix them. Interestingly enough, the exploit I have is actually only the first one I've tried on your site. When I find something I never continue testing for weaknesses until the current one is done with...in case you get a 2 for 1 on the fix.

Let me get down to why I'm emailing you. I'm offering a partnership of sorts where we agree to a fixed price for giving up the exploit and showing you where your vulnerability is for it. I'm also offering a partnership where we agree to another fixed fee for further testing on your site for more exploits. From my perspective, this makes the most business sense for both of us. I'm extremely confident in my ability to continue on with the exploit and scale it with a new deployment protocol in place, so I'm not at all worried about continuing to make money with this. Again, most of those "you caught me" accounts are nothing more than to extract information on how you are handling this.

I am enclosing a video which is my resume of sorts, one clip of which may be of interest to you. Feel free to respond back via email if you want to discuss this further. Here is the link: http://youtu.be/egkpf7ZvaiI (make sure volume is on). Thank you for your time.

BigBetRichy

Posts

Merits