Quote from: johanJ on May 29, 2024, 01:40:46 AM

i asked in the main thread, but did not get an answer.

This situation is a nice opportunity to actually rephrase my question

so here it is :

were the bets in this case actually matched on/by Pinnacle, i.e. Pinnacle was the market maker ?

for those of you not aware, Fairlay is actually an exchange, kind of like Betair, where anybody can create a market and accept bets on it. Alternatively anybody can bet on markets created by others.

there is always a sporting offer on Fairlay, the markets are exactly as on Pinnacle with the exact same odds. Fairlays terms and conditions mention that they actually use Pinnacle terms and conditions. From some posts and comments i also understood that Pinnacle is the default market maker.

thats why i asked if the above mentioned bets on potential match fixing games were actually matched on/by Pinnacle.

This. You risked more than you could afford and now you're trying to cut your losses?

Also why would you need an arbitrator here when you rely completely on Pinnacle? Just ask Pinnacle how they settled those bets. Pretty sure they paid out every cent.
After all Pinny has been in business for 25 years and they know what they are doing, not sure about Fairlay tho.

solsolsols

Posts

Merits