Quote from: CY4NiDE on Today at 09:52:49 PM

Quote from: zahid888 on Today at 10:37:43 AM

Everything is useless, I have tried many predictions like this, none of them worked Sad

Quote from: averagetoaster on Today at 11:23:34 AM

I also tried to predict #66 in a similar way but the ranges I got are still too big to do anything useful. I don't have high end hardware to test the predictions either, and the ranges I got are around 40% of the total range.
Factoring in that most likely the beginning and end of the ranges have been searched already, and doing other basic assumptions, you can reduce the range down but it's still too big.
Furthermore, now I am trying my luck on #130 because why not. It is very unlikely that #66 will get in my hands (or yours) so I just gave up on that.

Exactly. I'm also long done with #66.

I'm currently trying my luck with #130 too cause even brute forcing it could be done in less time than #66.

I shared this not with the intent of actually predicting the correct key, but to maybe narrow down the range.

Still, my rig would take one year to search from 290860e0f31602000:291fff00000000000.

Way more if 290860e0f31602000 is used as mid point instead of starting point.

Anyways, sorry if the idea is dumb, and thanks for your answers.

One year would be wonderful, whoever could solve 66 in one year! Roll Eyes

ccinet

Posts

Merits