Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 06:52:24 PM

Quote from: Achalugo BTC on Today at 03:13:33 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 19, 2025, 08:40:17 PM

Our level of aggressiveness or whimpiness is a choice, and there are ways to be aggressive without overdoing it, and surely the more aggressive we are, the more we run the risk of overdoing it in one way or another.. yet I doubt that being aggressive is a negative because we are able to tailor it to our own aspirations, and try to keep in mind if we might be pushing the boundaries too much in terms of starting to have negative consequences associated with our level of aggressiveness.

You are absolutely right, aggressiveness itself is a negative energy that brings in bad results, which can damage an individual lives.

Though aggressiveness is an emotion, which can be control by an individual if they don't want it to escalate, because if not control or balanced, it can affect in different areas of life like relationships, work etc.

Also, having self-regulation can help in adjusting their emotions or balancing to prevent any negative things that will be caused by aggression.

Your bot might need to better learn how to comprehend what you are reading... You are mischaracterizing, misunderstanding and/or perhaps you have no fucking clue about what I said. You are just making up your own bullshit spin.

In regards to bitcoin investing, we use the term aggressive to show how much a guy might prioritize investing into bitcoin so relatively speaking he chooses a higher level of his discretionary income is put into bitcoin, so the more and more aggressive he is, then he might make mistakes and overdo it or miscalculate and go beyond his discretionary income. So, sometimes guys can inadvertently overdo their aggressiveness in their bitcoin buying, and I frequently proclaim that guys should attempt to invest into bitcoin as aggressive as they can without overdoing it, so they have to figure out how much investing into bitcoin and prioritizing investing into bitcoin is enough, but not too much for them and their circumstances..

For sure, so many folks do not invest in bitcoin at all, so it seems to me that it would be better for them to choose to invest into bitcoin, even if they were to invest into bitcoin whimpily rather than not at all, so from my perspective, investing whimpily into bitcoin is better than not investing at all.

In the end, each of us chooses whether or not to invest into bitcoin, and then we also choose our level of aggressiveness or our whimpiness in terms of how much of our discretionary income we invest into bitcoin. We have to have discretionary income in order to invest in bitcoin, otherwise if we buy bitcoin out of money that we need for expenses, then we are trading/gambling rather than investing and we are also overdoing our aggressiveness from my perspective.

There is no exact right answer, even though there are consequences to our actions, and historically, bitcoin has rewarded those who have invested into it and has rewarded those who aggressively invested into bitcoin even moreso, since bitcoin has been a quite positively performing asset, and aggressiveness was rewarded, so long as they did not overdo it. Since we are currently at all time highs in our BTC prices, anyone who errored on the side of investing into bitcoin over the years, has ended up doing quite well over the years, and sure the longer that they have been in bitcoin, buying bitcoin and holding bitcoin the better for their finances, yet they also need to have enough income to be able to pay for their living expenses while they are investing into bitcoin over the years.

I think I got kind of confused at some point and misunderstood the whole aggressiveness stuff, as related to Bitcoin investment, but your explanation makes a lot more sense now and has provided a more vivid and clearer picture of what you meant. From what I was able to understand and grab from your explanation, aggressiveness in Bitcoin refers to how much of an investor's discretionary income is allocated to Bitcoin accumulation. When we consider an investor to be more aggressive in their approach, it means that they have prioritize Bitcoin investment or accumulation more heavily, but there's actually a very thin line between being overly aggressive in one's approach and overdoing the whole thing, and this can potentially lead to mistakes like investing beyond one's means.

According to your suggestion, you're implying that it's way more better to invest in Bitcoin, even if it's actually whimpily or sluggishly done, than not investing at all, and I find this to be very true and agreeable. You know, there are a lot of investors or should I say those who plan to invest, but they've not been able to make any step towards getting started, maybe because their idea of Bitcoin accumulation is being aggressive, so they can reach their long term goals faster, and since they currently do not have the resources to invest in that pace, they choose not to get started, and this is way worst than investing whimpily, especially given the historical performance of Bitcoin, even with a whimpy investor, it'll only take time and dedication before they'll reach their goal. The key I believe lies within finding a balance based on the circumstances and position of the individual and their financial stability. I see that you also emphasized on the importance of having a discretionary income to invest in Bitcoin, rather than using money meant for other expenses, which would seem more like trading or gambling, and I see a lot of sense in what you've said, because if an investor forfeits his expenses and uses the money to invest in Bitcoin, it might later cause him some financial strain, and maybe even lead to using money from your investment to foot those bills/expenses.

From what I understand, the level of aggressiveness is more of a personal choice, and although there could be some consequences to these choices, judging from the historical view of Bitcoin, it has always been rewarding to invest in Bitcoin, especially when a balanced approach is employed.

WhoYouCantKill

Posts

Merits