Quote from: cnupo on May 07, 2017, 01:30:54 PM

Quote from: vdramaliev on May 03, 2017, 01:10:46 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 03, 2017, 10:29:26 AM

Quote from: snowboard789 on May 03, 2017, 09:58:30 AM

My argument holds for BTC and USD. You mean that people will be satisfied that they "lost" money in BTC and USD but are OK in terms of ETH only?

That would make die hard fans of eth and this project is actually another eth implementation so it creates and even bigger paradox

Well I am against it as it screws every ICO investor that used ETH out of their ETH.

It's not like the round two amounts were to be announced.

They were published for everyone to see.

To modify them after the fact isn't fair.

If AE does that I have literally lost ETH for no good reason.

Guys,

I replied at Reddit, pasting my reply here as well:

Thank you for voicing your concerns. Let me try addressing them.

1. We have received (and are currently still receiving) many developer applications. We are currently screening them and having interviews. We have some people in a testing phase working with us, since we want to make sure that we hire really good fits. As soon as we have tech people joining the team - we'll announce it and have them on the website.

2. Regarding the ratio between ETH and AE tokens. There are two sides to this. On one side there are the people who already contributed and there are the future contributors. Both have diverging interests. We believe that the best way to balance those is not to change what has already been announced.

There are factors outside of our control. The best way to adapt to them is to persevere.

Regards,
Vlad

OK, great, if you decide like that so you should have ability to contribute with bitcoins also, like in Phase 1, Right?!

yes, give us rate in btc!

clubhouse

Posts

Merits