Quote from: IMJim on August 29, 2014, 05:57:35 AM

Quote from: NULLthefuture on August 29, 2014, 05:52:23 AM

Quote from: poornamelessme on August 28, 2014, 10:51:34 PM

I suggest going with coinssource verification if you wish to pass on POD. Although I'd suggest both. I think all ICO coins nowadays need at least some form of developer verification, be it through an exchange or one of the above methods.

A somewhat interesting choice of a coin name there. Null means something is invalid, or zero.

Our development team has contacted Cryptoasian to get a POD. ICO will be hosted by C-cex, they will not release the funds to the development team unless certain criterias are met. Wallet will be available for testing by selected members of the community, and open google hangout sessions will be conducted.

Isn't Cryptasian the one that is providing fake "paid for" PODs? C-Cex seems a bad recommendation right now as well, problems with their ICOs have much of the community losing much respect for that exchange.

I'm not trying to be a jerk man, just saying this stuff is getting bad and the majority of people are gonna laugh at this.

My development team is trying to be open with the community. As a trusted member, what do you suggest or recommend we do. We are a legitimate team, and as such we are willing to go the extra mile.

NULLthefuture

Posts

Merits