Quote from: Spoetnik on June 26, 2016, 03:10:52 AM

Quote from: tokeweed on June 26, 2016, 02:12:59 AM

I doubt that's true. Poloniex has never made any public statement on why they decided not to list a coin/token. And I don't think that will change. Out of respect and a proper way to handle things, Poloniex would let this remain behind the scenes and would not have issued a public statement that would risk debasing any platform or project. That's just bad for business overall.

You are wrong and i am right as always ..and don't you dare forget it Grin

One word.. Supercoin.

Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin

Posted by.. busoni June 14, 2014, 01:20:32 PM

So.. next time check your facts before opening your mouth or contact me to vette your "opinion" son. Cool

There is my opinion and the wrong one..

PS:
@OP
Cool story bro and i wish it was true.. Waves is an ICO and they are all scams. (so it should not be added regardless)
I also am not impressed with Poloniex's track record & wish they would get their shit together.
I lost a lot of respect for them watching them like eager-beavers running to add BlockNET way back.

And hella great point.. where were they with the scam ICO DAO or ICO scam Ethereum for that matter ?
Seems to me they just sort of add any scammy ass ICO bullshit ..as long as they get paid.
Classy Roll Eyes

I am highly suspicious this news is true though.

Posted by.. busoni Vs. Someone claiming "high-ranking employee of the exchange" with 'Newborn baby' status on forum is too childish to consider .....

BDCoinMiner

Posts

Merits