I wouldn't trust a thing from that shitcoin site.

How do you see the Trust score, it depends on your Trust list and settings. Check this thread from LoyceV, it's very explanatory.


This user is over from back then. No matter who gets the ownership of this account, this feedback will never change. Especially Lauda's...

However, you have only USDT available...
And if/ when you buy the BTC, you will sell them here for +7%.
What an idea...


Probably, he isn't satisfied with the current number of buyers that he has.

It's still a work in progress

If you would like, I can emulate the altcoin experience by adding a function which slashes your funds in half every time Bitcoin goes down by 2%

Well, bitcoin was worth a few cents, then it reached a single-digit dollar value, then two, and so on. Currently, it's at six-digit figures, so it makes sense, right?

I bet OP already lost some money, which is why he is asking for the location with the hope he can get back his money. Good Luck, buddy!

Yeah, right. But does the daily volume on CMC usually means only spot trading on all exchanges? and sometimes it might include futures or other stuff too. Like perpetual futures making up to 60% + of all crypto trading volume. Still, 510,000 BTC moving daily is a lot compared to what’s left on exchanges, but a big/huge buy like 22,000 BTC still isn’t something you can just buy without the market noticing…

I thought it was you. I might be mistaken but you somewhere wrote about it that when you registered your intention was something else then later your interest grew for Bitcoin and the technology.

There was a user I can not remember his name. He was banned for spamming but later he earned a good name. I am not regular so I can't remember the name clearly. In fact, I don't know if I will recognize the user if I see him in a discussion.

How did you find out what the question was?
Anyway, it's very fun that you even had to say that nobody will give OP a wallet with 3 billion dollars. I thought they would, but now that you clarified it, I will be more hesitant.

yes ok but I'm really not against the day towards these workers who do the oldest job in the world
I don't care even if it was done
I really don't know about this nonsense about the day of the sandwich with ham or the day of the child with almond eyes or other nonsense like that

I said I am like sheldon cooper, I dont understand sarcasm, lol bazinga

It was brainboss LoyceV!
I have seen you mentioned that somewhere else and I remember that pretty well. You were talking about Brainboss who is a campaign manager right now. This is not his username, but his service name is Brain boss Management. His username is kinda hard, I am not surprised that you couldn’t remember his username.

@babo, sarcasm lose the power if that needed explanation.

ah now I get it, I consider these things of the days of things a nuance of woke culture, which I hate because it's stupid
we are at the twilight of intelligence with woke culture, do not support these brainless men

Can't argue with that, though what I will say is that Xal0lex probably should've seen the pattern and not been so generous; it's not as if he's a newbie and hasn't seen all of the merit abuse and assorted shenanigans over the years.  

On the other hand, this is just some questionable merit-giving we're talking about and even if it were blatant abuse, there's not much that anyone's going to do about it anyway.  Theymos doesn't even care all that much about merit abuse (and I'm still waiting to hear his State-of-the-Merit-System address but am doubtful that it'll ever come).


Who was that?

IIRC, it was in a Reddit comment from their representative replying to a user who claimed they got banned recently. I think the user stated that they did use a lot of data in a month, but never explicitly stated the number of it, then the Windscribe representative claimed it was 60 PB/month. Other reports claimed the users only use 10 TB or less,s so I'm not sure the exact limit for their "unlimited" plan. I guess I'll look for other services if they keep being hush hush about it.

I don't think flags generally carry date or timestamps. Probably some other extensions by LoyceV could have data on that but based on the forum's interface alone I don't think flags come with dates. Normal trust tags come with dates even if you don't add a reference link. LoyceV also has a data collection on that and it's pretty much why I guessed he should probably have one on this too.
However generally the flags are usually created shortly after what happens on a thread so it's usually within same date window.

Excellent work. Thank you very much.

By the way, I take this opportunity to ask. Are you able to easily make backups of TalkImg images?
The model I implemented is working well?

I don't think he is necessarily talking about today. As currently the mempool is empty for some time, previously it was full for many months all the time. I remember all the fuss about ordinals, and then runes and so on during the last year. I'm not sure whether it will come back as the wider market of these things suffered massive losses after this period of activity and spam.

Anyway the point stands that there is no reason to do everything on chain.

If only all major services always paid attention to this. 

The fee rate recommendation is below text "Transaction Fees". As for which recommendation, you can hover your cursor (on desktop) or touch (on mobile) the priority text to see their defnition of high, medium, low and no priority.


As stated by @LoyceV, it should be depends on OP needs since mempool.space shows fee rate recommendation.


Some wallet also have preview feature where you can see transaction size before the TX is signed/broadcasted.

What spam?
Bitcoin mempool is empty for months and number of transactions is slowly but surely decreasing.
People who want to crate spam moved on new altcoin blockchains, so I think even ethereum fees are now much lower.

First, the local community has to unite and apply for a local board, right? I know there was an application, but it is too old. As far as I understand, the admins know the real size of the community. It may look like we have 30+ active posters, but I think admins know how many of them operate alternative accounts. I think he would smile and stay silent when he sees the application again.

Why would I remove that? Isn't that obvious why they are posting these things? You should blame the abuser instead of someone else.

Look like he is getting a lot of positive energy from his brother
Cryptoddler




Copleaks: 100%
Origin Gptzero: 100%



Copleaks: 100%
Origin Gptzero: 100%



Copleaks: 100%
Origin Gptzero: 100%

Also, this scam could be post here  Crypto Scam Tracker along with the whole story

OP created the scam accustion thread, link is at the bottom of his post.

Anwyay, flag supported. And yeah, it's unbelievable how reckless people are with their money.

Exchanges have an interest in keeping users funds on their platforms, mostly for control in my opinion. But that doesn’t mean the Bitcoin network is sitting idle it’s actually being used quite a lot. Spam transactions might not showcase that in a nicer way, but they’re still proof that block space is being purchased

Only if they can read here and make their discussion atleast 80% bitcoin discussion, the remaining 20 can go to meet up, politics and the rest. They have more of off topic posts.

In France we have this tax deduction thing only since a few years ago, well there was a form of it before but the money was stuck until retirement age no ifs no buts the only exception being personal bankruptcy, so that wasn't an option for me, but now they have relaxed the rules.

I have however with my job a tax free thing where I get "matching contributions", so I put the max in there (5400€/year). I just started the aforementioned thing, that lowers my income by as much as I put in it so I get taxed less, and my job also contributes some to it, so that's free money.

Like LoyceV I see it as diversification, that helps me hodling BTC. And for example I'm looking at houses and plan to spend all/most of that fiat stuff but none of my BTC stash to buy it.

Also as long as I'm here the taxman is taking a huge chunk of my paycheck to give it to retirees so in theory I'll get a state pension out of that, although I'm not sure the system will still be there by then and I plan to retire 20 years early so that will probably not work, let's say it's plan C.

Many of us are still getting used to bitcoin, and it is a bit of a moving target, so yeah there will be ongoing pushes to put all of us into KYC channels, yet the non-KYC channels are not completely closed, even though there may well continue to be increasing barriers, yet we do not necessarily need to be controlled by the barriers and the channels that financial institutions, traditionally rich folks and/0r governments may want to place us and/or keep us.


I understand the lure of the tax deductions and even possible employer matching within retirement plans such as 401k.. even though your retirement plans are likely different from the ones available in the USA and surely not everyone has access to various retirement investment funds.

I am thinking that I would have had been distracted if I was still contributing into my 401k from 2014 and thereafter, which I was not, and so bitcoin became a substitute for my 401k contributions that no longer were available to me at that time.

There can be employer matching up to 5% or something like that, and depending on income there can be tax benefits (deferral) up to $23,500 per year, which surely can be tempting to get the tax deferral up to the limit, even though it may well be better to invest into bitcoin rather than receiving the tax deferral benefit.


Bitcoin dominance is not really very relevant in these here parts even though shitcoiners love to use such bitcoin dominance metrics (to the extent that they are not made up figures) to trade shitcoins or even to bounce between trading shitcoins and trading bitcoin..


From my perspective, for anyone who had reached an overaccumulation status, then such person would just sell from the overaccumulated portion of their holdings and not necessarily sell any bitcoin with any expectation to buy back cheaper.


It is problematic to create a bunch of small UTXOs - hopefully people understand the issue, especially if they are poor and they are creating a bunch of $10 to $100 UTXOs, it can become quite problematic for them at various times in the future.

It's very strange to create a VPN only for MacOS users, I think that's mostly a marketing plan because if privacy is the main reason, then they should be linux focused but their product is focused on Apple users and by marking their VPN as MacOS limited, it might make some people to feel that this is a special service for Mac and they might buy it for only that reason.

Good luck to them with CBDC in Germany
Wasn't UK enforcing KYC on transactions higher than 2K pounds? Or something like that?

I agree with you, that's way better and fair price model.

Me neither, I dislike unreasonable discounts, because they look like they have put a red arrow pointing at them saying "here we are, notice us please"


Yeah certainly, even though when I travelled to the a country in the middle east, I didn't see a major difference, but it obviously depends on the country and their internet performance.

Of course, another problem with selling too much too soon is that we would never really know for sure when to get back in, so then we spend a lot of time waiting for the price to drop to some kind of a target price, and maybe it drops and maybe it does not. If we are still accumulating bitcoin, we might end up waiting and waiting to buy, and instead of buying regularly, persistently, ongoingly, consistently and perhaps even aggressively, we are waiting.  Waiting is not a good strategy for anyone who is still in their accumulation stage and who has not yet reached a high enough status of accumulation or a status of overaccumulation.

Guys can do what they like, yet in bitcoin, we have a large number of bitcoiners (perhaps low coiners) who end up selling way too much of their bitcoin too soon, even when they should be accumulating bitcoin and they may well even consider themselves to be accumulating bitcoin, yet they are engaging in conduct to sell bitcoin with a purpose of buying more of it, which is contradictory and does not help to bring them to their goal of reaching overaccumulation status.. .which is a place that most of us should want to be, even if our numbers in regards to what is overaccumulation status are different.

Right now, I would  consider a person who has a goal to have an $80k per year income to be at his threshold of overaccumulation status with 16.837 BTC. Sure, if he has a few more bitcoin (maybe something like 20 BTC for cushion of 3.163 BTC) then that makes it easier to make sure that he does not ever dip below overaccumulation status in the event that he wants to enter into either price-based and/or time-based sustainable withdrawal.

I doubt that selling and/or trading as compared to strict regular, ongoing and perhaps even aggressive buying helps to assure getting to an overaccumulation status faster.. and from my perspective if a person sells bitcoin in order to try to buy back at a lower price, then he is likely taking chances (ie. gambling) in terms of screwing up his accumulation of BTC.  Sure, he might get lucky, but from my perspective it is not worth it to be taking those kinds of chances with an investment like bitcoin.


There is no need to give up so easily.  Each of us likely has abilities to put our coins into private placement and also to figure out networks to transact directly with others rather than giving in to having to have our transactions channeled.  We also might need to keep track of transactions that are KYC and ones that are not... and so for example if we are removing coins from Bitstamp or similar exchanges and they are asking us questions, then perhaps we mostly keep those coins in wallets in which we send them back the same coins that we took from them when it comes time to cash out some of them (if we are going to use their exchange for such purposes).

Should be creating more (rather than fewer) incentives to figure out ways to transact privately.  I recall local bitcoins had allowed for people to contact each other directly, and frequently I would do my first transaction on local bitcoins and if I liked the person, then I would do any future transactions directly.. .. but yeah, that Local bitcoin's service does not exist any more.


You buy stocks?


Surely for anyone who is in their first cycle or two then maybe they are still buying bitcoin at any price, but if any of us are either into 3 cycles or even close to 3 cycles, then we should have had mostly accumulated already or perhaps we graduate to some kind of buying on dips, and yeah, this move from $112k to $107k is hardly a dip of significance, including that we had sub $100k prices for right around 3 months including some prices that were in the $70ks and even lower $80ks for quite a long time (like all of March and at least half of April).


I fixed the above quote to add what I had said.


If you are getting excited about gold rather than bitcoin, you are getting lost in the short-term noise.

I would like to nominate LoyceV as a Bitcointalk Forum Hall of Famer.  He is truly legendary.

Nice to see @LoyceV it is the wonderful merit history on your profile 18888.
Love this buddy.💕

What on earth is someone going to do with a 10 smerit allocation? 

Well I would have to believe what you said because if not so there wouldn't had been any day that people submit application and he don't even respond or give a word to those who has already submitted application, and again while does some people have a higher merits allocations than others. All this made me have this rethink that Merit is political, in fact everything is politics and one must be strong on forum politics to be able to survive in all aspects and that is what they called reputation.

This is a nice suggestion and since there no move to add more sources then I am fully in support of this steps. This will help reduces the task on merits sources if their messengers are working for them. I mean, if such amount are being credited to the people on the list then it would also relief those merits source from much task of reading and giving out merits.

5000

The great opportunity was only a few weeks ago brother….

108-111 is like just the same…

Greed can make people want more even when they have enough. If a manger is not content with his pay he might be tempted to enrol alt(s). Since the campaign management market is competitive, a campaign manager might want to charge lesser fees just to get a job. At that point he might start seeking for diverse means to increase his earning which night include enrolling his own accounts in the campaign. Just as others have stated reputable campaign mangers will not engage in such misbehavior because they are concerned about their brand/name. I also agree that this behaviour happens rarely.

Now I'm trying to adapt here & find as much information as I can, I'm not looking for merit (at least for now), just trying to contribute as much as I can. I saw there were some good threads on our local board that were not BTC related, that's why I asked.

mine is not a perfect proposal
but it's always better than the 3 month rotation proposal, that is, it doesn't change anything for me but follow my reasoning, should I rotate every 3 months for 45 merits? come on
you understand very well that it's a ridiculous thing

how ridiculous is my smerit allocation after all, it's funny but I do it for the good of the community so if I have less, I give less

I tried doing this for a short while and got burned by giving merits to alt accounts; some of which ended up becoming scammers or sig campaign cheaters. That is the personal reason why I am unlikely to give an account which I am not overly familiar with a bunch of merits all at the same time.


Agreed.


Hehe.

I would give LoyceV more merits for this post but he has too damn many already. He's too good, is why. Not just because he's part of the Merit Cycling Gang.

I think it's pretty clear when you realize that it’s all just a marketing trick. They have to latch onto the bitcoin name to sell their JPEGs or whatever else they’re promoting. If this was happening on some regular centralized platform, no one would care...
Meanwhile, the network gets clogged, fees go up, and people who just want to use bitcoin end up paying the price. And as long as there are people throwing money at it, it’s not going to disappear on its own. Fixing this would require a lot more changes  but right now, that seems almost impossible.

On this note I wonder why any reputable manager(s) would accept to manage a campaign where the campaign participants earn more than he does that's crazy if you ask me and if it's happening that means the attention of members have not been drawn to such things that's why it has not been exposed.

You may notice the difference if you dig a little bit. If we remove merits shared from WO, ranking up threads, merit review threads, and forum drama/politics, the activity on merits shared that's actually related to crypto might decline a lot compared to the past.

Quality of posts decreased? Probably but if we concentrate on Bitcoin, we can't come up with new ideas every day but rewarding something that's not pure spam could be a new criterion.

From my perspective of Theymos view on all this going on, if merit source must be added it has to be proved to Theymos that the increase in the number of newly registered members and/or posts in the forum is way too high that the merit in circulation is not enough anymore.

And from my perspective, Theymos is looking at the statistics of the forum there is no increase in new members or activity instead it goes up and down within a normal ratio. which makes me think that's the more reason Theymos hasn't approved new merit source or increased the merit allocation of any merit source.

---

However, is anyone in this forum making any good post and is not recieving merits? of course No so what is the reason behind the merit increase discussion, in my opinion it's just a sense of power or superiority to others that's the reason why guys are forced into requesting for merit increment and also a sense of belonging to the ruling class of the forum through merit. Hence the merit system is more of a power struggle mechanism.

I saw somewhere that shasan stated that he has about $30k invested through various loans. It is a serious question, what if he wants to get out of the lending business? It can't just be that he demands full payment from people in a short period.
A good example is Darkstar, which still has open loans even though it stopped its lending business 2 years ago

You are right and only 50 can be sent for the duration of 30 days or 1 months after which that user can be able to still top another 50 in that same post.
I have seen some post having 100 merits from a particular user but they don't earn the 100 at a go but after one month gap.

---

By the way from OP,  I will advise that many merits source aren't holding back their merits sometimes it's actually very hard for them to keep finding quality post to merit but they can't just dump such amount of merits to any random posts they comes across without evaluating how quality such post could be or how contributive and helpful it's to the general public before receiving such quality.

Absolutely haven't seen any of the post received more than a 100 merits, however when looked at I figured out that posts that has 100 merit by a user are basically sent over time months or two months of sending 50.

Absolutely can't agree less to this, but according to BitcoinGirl.Club abusers will always abuse. but whether it's used for egoistic purposes by some I guess it's meeting the purpose of its creation.

FWIW, there's small I/O slowdown on read/write benchmark even when your CPU is fast enough. See https://scs.community/2023/02/24/impact-of-disk-encryption/, specifically benchmark result on SAS HDD. Although it's small enough where most people won't even notice it.


Do you post this reply on wrong thread or intentionally being off-topic?
1. OP never state he own any Mac device.
2. OP never mention or ask anything about connecting to Bitcoin node, so why do you mention RPC?
3. Other full node and application that use RPC-JSON protocol still can connect to your full node, even if FDE is enabled. So i don't understand why you mention Electrum server.


If you have neither (fast disk or big RAM capacity), you probably better not force yourself to run full node anyway.

Thanks

Submitting blocks with zero transactions is faster than including transactions.

Exactly 
especially if they are merits source like me with a monthly smerit endowment of 45 smerit
It doesn't make much sense
my solution, on the other hand, sorry if I'm not humble, makes more sense.
spread any excess smerits on several people

I don't know LoyceV has 800 merits and can't give them all, he takes I don't know dkbit98 and makes two smerits source of 400

logical, right?

This topic might help you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5460744.0

But, you should take LoyceV's advice, and don't.

I don't see it, honestly. If anything, it would be some other country or countries.

well said dude

What we are witnessing now feels like a live stress test of global economic policies, Bitcoin is quietly becoming the benchmark here for trust in a world of depreciating fiat. You are right this is a glimpse into how different governments will respond under pressure & those moves will shape the next decade

For individuals especially in regions facing structural decline, it is not just about fleein, it  is about positioning wisely. Game theory is in motion  & those who understand BTC’s asymmetric advantage early are already a few moves ahead on the board

USA will default in 2027

all part of the plan.

I am sure theymos would ''love'' to have additional work in rotating merit source members all the time
I honestly don't see how this would improve anything in this forum, not to mention that members would never be sure about merit source status.
Maybe some inactive merit source could be removed and replaced, but I don't want to have more complications with rotation.

Maybe they are not monitoring exact merit number, they just spend it as they go.

Indeed those are good points. For Europeans looking to flee before it completely falls apart it even can be viewed as an opportunity. Looking forward though, you’re getting a preview of what actions each government will take as fiat continues to crumble. If Game Theory in Bitcoin becomes a thing, there will be very obvious winners and losers. We’re seeing the writing on the wall now.

Probably before/on the weekend, we will have an all round celebration of a NEW ATH.

Seems some weak hands have liquidated the market already, but we move regardless, the moon will be our starting point

Sight you @Infofront, WO originator!

It actually highlights how complicated global finance has become. it is true the us $ remains dominant in market, it comes with trade-offs like a vast national debt & aggressive monetary policy

On the flip side a stronger € does mean slower BTC gain for EU holders in fiat terms, but it also reflects partially unyielding fiscal control

At the end of the day, Satoshi built Bitcoin to rise above these fiat battle utterly whether you are stacking sats in USD, EUR, or any other currency, the long term goal is financial sovereignty

Printers have been in control of the economy this whole time.


Get well soon!


That's good, lol. Gotta remember this.

Ya, because a strong dollar is the goal when we’re nearly $40,000,000,000,000 in debt… Imagine being proud of being a fiat bagholder while the US is printing money and stacking BTC. Europe is failing in every way and a strong currency while your manufacturing is disappearing and you’re repatriating assets to try and stay alive is not the strong position some think it is. This is why Europe is 50 years behind. They’re playing checkers while the US and China are playing chess.

well hey we work with what we have..

This is indicative of a weak USD and strong EUR. FWIW, we just barely hit a new ATH in USD.

When we properly break out soon, everyone will be able to celebrate.

In simple terms is because they have had more years to print more papers. A known secret is that They have more printer

Well, the dollar shitcoin is worth a lot less lately. Interesting to see that reflected in the price of bitcoins....

Did not realize the odds are that bad. Then I might just as well wash windows after hours instead.

now you understand why in the end I don't agree with the rotation, if you rotate my sMerits, 45 to another you just make a huge effort, for 45 smerit. 45 smerits to give is easy effort for me

Instead, maybe those who have smerit > 1000 would be better off splitting it in two
just so as not to give him too much effort

thank you i prefer this


ah cool, thank you for info, i try to understand what is better for my purpose


ty you too for your response
we really have a lot of possibilities thanks to people who made awesome tools, bpip was created by suchmoon? i don't remember - thanks to all

I was overflowing with sMerit - over 1,000.  I decided to trust Theymos and do what he suggested.  He removed me as a source.  :/

Terima kasih atas koreksinya, nampaknya yang dimaksud OP adalah sebagaimana yang agan sebutkan di atas. Saya baru 'ngeh' istilah tersebut, barusan googling dan menemukan informasi berupa tabel berikut:

---

Kalau tidak salah, LoyceV pernah mengingatkan perihal trust perlu juga diupdate atau di review kembali (koreksi jika saya keliru); Karena kondisi pemilik akun bisa saja berganti, semisal di hack atau diperjual belikan. Jadi, trust yang ada pada sebagian user memang belum tentu valid setelah kurun waktu tertentu.

---

btw, sejauh ini belum ada kesimpulan dari OP terkait apakah rencananya untuk share informasi dari akademi crypto tersebut jadi atau tidak.

I see where you are coming from 
Probably a mistake? @Zwei also noticed another one

---

He was probably under the radar or perhaps no one bothered to report such posts before, let's see what the mods will do now that this has been brought to their attention. I remember a certain service complaining about their translated posts being deleted no so long ago

Pa zato i je misterija, tko zna zasto su coini vraceni natrag na tu adresu, niti ja nisam mogao smisliti nikakav logican razlog za to ali eto, blockchain ne laze.

O zašto bi netko vratio coine na wallet čiji private key je javno otkriven? Jedino tko je mogao izvući coine s tog walleta je netko tko je vidio private key na slici što znači da je čitao thread. Zar nije onda pametnije javiti se čovjeku i pitati ga vratiti coine?

Merit is for quality posts and if there are not enough quality posts, source merit can be spent less than before. If the forum changes to be less active in future, consequently in this example, there are less quality posts, so sourced merit monthly can be reduced and can be spent less. It's natural and there is no convincing reasons for dumping sourced merit on non-quality posts just because your monthly countdown timer comes to very last days.

Napisao je da nije odmah pokupio BCH i ostale forkove, a kad se sjetio vec mu ih je netko popalio.

A da misterija bude veca nakon nekog vremena ih je dobio nazad,pa je nedugo nakon toka opet (netko drugi?) maznuo coine sa te adrese

oops, i must have gotten mixed up - its fixed now!

That's good to know. Although it's not exactly straightforward option when you plan to create paper wallet, since you need to generate wallet/import private key, create backup and move backup to computer (which used to create paper wallet).


iOS version of their wallet last updated 2 years ago[1]. That may be reason behind warning you see.

[1] https://github.com/mycelium-com/wallet-ios

@LoyceV I don't know if I've already asked you and so I asked you this question
but do you have some sort of bees to ask if a person is banned or not?
I can't figure out how to figure out who is banned or not in the forum

couldn't we have a special "banned" "title"? insteed of rank, we can put banned

Thank you, dear cygan

I announced d5000 about the new translation. I have one small mention though... Where you wrote "Original Thema:" you named d5000's topic, but the hyperlink leads to LoyceV's topic

What a problem and one many would prefer to have instead of the common one ''You have 0 sendable merit (sMerit) which you can send to other people.'' lol.


Why 3 months, why not 1 like the DT system and after immediately you lose your merit source status, you lose all the source smerit. This will discourage hoarding of smerit but for this to be flawless, it can't be influence by voting like with the DT system. Theymos has to be the one deciding who gets to be the source or not. Now how does he choose the right candidates?. He can't ask for recommendations either because then we begin to have some favouritism.

Maybe a small heads-up would help...? So here we go

• [2025] Bitcoin Pizza Day on Bitcointalk 🍕 by icopress: [FIL*] [UKR*] [RUS*] [ARA*] [URD*] [POR*]

     *Update pending.

This should be in the attention of Peanutswar, DrBeer, N.O, Adiljutt156 and r_victory.

Porf, please be aware that the PID translation made by SatoPrincess was also updated.
Also, Porf, did you PM the non-AOBT translators about this...? In this moment only N.O remains should be PMed...

---

Regarding the remaining 2 topics in progress, the situation is the following:

• [May 2025]Fees are low, think about Consolidating your small inputs @1.00 sat/vb by LoyceV: [POR] [RUS] [GER] [POL] [SPA] [UKR] [PID] [ROM]

This thread has 8 translations, thus only 2 more are needed. The available languages are: [FRE] [ARA] [IDN] [TUR] [UKR] [FIL] [BAN] [URD] [HIN]. Therefore, this should be in the attention of paid2, khaled0111 / Zwei, Husna QA / dansus, mindrust / mela65, DrBeer, Peanutswar, DS, Adiljutt156 and M47AK16.

• Fees are low? Make your coins more private and (almost) quantum safe! by d5000: [POR] [UKR]

This thread has 2 translations, thus 8 more are needed. The available languages are: [GER] [POL] [ROM] [RUS] [FRE] [ARA] [IDN] [SPA] [TUR] [FIL] [PID] [BAN] [URD] [HIN]. Therefore, this should be in the attention of cygan, zasad@ / DrBeer, paid2, khaled0111 / Zwei, Husna QA / dansus, Porf, mindrust / mela65, Peanutswar, DS, Adiljutt156, M47AK16 and myself.

---

Apart from all this, Porf, can you take a look, please, at the image links for mindrust and zasad@? Their images in OP are broken...

Claiming forks must be done properly and safely.

Firstly the bitcoin life-changing amount must be redemeed and moved to a new non custodial wallet. Then this man can claim forks with that private key - remember only do fork claiming after this private key and bitcoin address has empty bitcoin in it.

A guide for fork claiming.
LoyceV's Bitcoin Fork claiming guide (and service).

Most of 2017 and later forks died with time.
How Many Bitcoin Forks Are There? You will be surprised!!!