Quote from: Racey on November 03, 2016, 08:31:20 PM

Quote from: d-leit on November 03, 2016, 08:29:39 PM

well, of course she is dishonest, she is a politician. she's still clear better choice to trump and i am wishing americans to see that next week.

Its ignorant to vote for Hillary Clinton without reading WikiLeaks

If you defend Clinton and ignore WikiLeaks, you have something in common with Sarah Palin. Let that sink in for a moment. Finished processing that? Now process this if the journalists responsible for reporting on Watergate were labeled Russian sympathizers, charged by the media as attempting to influence an election, and banned from travel or communication access, how would history judge the event? This is exactly what has happened to Julian Assange, who has done more for journalism than any of these corporate-owned, brand-named media products have done this election cycle. Either you support access to information or you have a problem with an informed public. Which side are you on?

yes, i am supportive of wikileaks and do not believe them to be agents of russia. as i said, she is dishonest. it is probably that her advisors decided to lie and say russia is trying to get trump elected by using wikileaks.

and i also agree voters should be informed by reading the wikileaks material (i am not united states voter).

but even with all the bad information about clinton, the corruption, i look at trump and hear what he says about immigrants. trump i cannot support and cannot wish for the presidency. it is too bad the green partei does not have support in the united states.

d-leit

Posts

Merits