Quote from: NILIcoin on January 30, 2018, 02:02:09 PM

Quote

Can both theories and teams work on the one chain?

No they can't!

So the gap is far to great to bridge for the two teams to work on the same chain. However the investors are that bridge since their investment is still funding the efforts of both teams as it should be.

but then as a shareholder in both products which will benefit fro both success while is insured against a failure of one firm. Best deal ever for the investor, worst deal for the developer.

Quote

let is compete and indeed merge and fork and whatever.

I think both teams want to find truth and work ability and usability..

Lets not infight. But go back to the roots of exploration.

Can this work out?

That is what I try to do, and it should workout even if the disagreement continue.

Unlike Tezos and Cardano Tauchain and Autonomic are developed by the original thinkers and developers who came up with the concept to begin with. So they dont need hundreds of developers and other team member to make up for the the luck of clarity in their goal, they can pretty much do it through their own work.

Will both dev teams verify that.

That regardless of technical and other views they are working through to create two competing products all under the same investors umbrella?

Lets not end up like Core and Cash.

I do believe both side elucidate that this was not either of their idea and so i wonder who was the original thinker??

SO financially will it work out that Tau records the AGR holders and at release point an airdrop will occur from the automic team?

Is this what you have in mind? Or what is the funding process here?

It would be awesome if the two teams had over-management and released the chain and it forked on block 2 after genesis. So perhaps there can be some technical UI UX combined dev work while the logic and processes then slit in the fork.

Dao
Tau

chains...

LiskEnterprise

Posts

Merits