Quote from: cryptasm on September 30, 2014, 04:13:29 PM

Quote from: umair127 on September 29, 2014, 06:36:26 PM

Bush had what warnings of 9/11? The FBI could not trace those that were listed by the CIA. So those that occurred in Bostow on 9/11 were not during the time this adminstration? Shallow thoughts are obvious. You do manage to keep the lies aout Araq. You do sound like one under the Sharia law.

Yep, Dubya had plenty of warnings about a potential 911 attack by OBL.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91651

"U.S. intelligence officials warned President Bush weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks that Osama bin Laden's terrorist network might hijack American planes".

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0

"On Aug. 6, 2001, President George W. Bush received a classified review of the threats posed by Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network, Al Qaeda. That mornings presidential daily brief the top-secret document prepared by Americas intelligence agencies featured the now-infamous heading: Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S. A few weeks later, on 9/11, Al Qaeda accomplished that goal".

In short, the concept of muslims killing muslims, while we set back munching fritos and licking our chops, was quickly falling to one victory after another by ISIS and having the entire country of Iraq becoming one fanatical Islamic State. Now, instead of "whack-a-mole", we have an entire country of Islamic fanatics absolutely devoted to setting the entire ME ablaze...not to mention their hard-on for the good ole USA.

I get the idea here that the powers that be in Washington have decided that waiting until the ME is a blazing inferno probably isn't the best way to go and most likely doesn't really address our own national security interests in that region of the world. And whether we like it or not, sitting idly by, crossing our fingers and hoping for the best...doesn't exactly feed the bulldog here.

umair127

Posts

Merits