Quote from: Peter R on March 03, 2014, 02:54:21 AM

The link you posted reports the estimated transaction volume, where Blockchain.info has attempted to subtract off the change. We must consider the total output value as the "change" would have gone to the thief too. The total output volume on June 19, 2011 was 1,301,575 BTC (EDIT: and 5,000,000 BTC on the 20th and I don't know the time zones assumed.)

It was even 9235k the 16th. I considered the total output volume too, but it made no sense to me that the thief would need any change, because he has no reason for not spending the entire inputs, except to obscure what he's doing.
OTOH, the volatility of the total output volume was so high those days, that I find it impossible to see an indication for a $1000k move.

Quote from: Peter R on March 03, 2014, 02:54:21 AM

Quote from: varta on March 03, 2014, 02:38:25 AM

Anyway, I now like your plot even better, guess why Wink

Why? I'm curious.

Now I have a reason to get more popcorn and hope for a happier ending.

varta

Posts

Merits