Quote from: NILIcoin on January 24, 2018, 09:20:43 AM

10. For the Angoras investors this move double the chance for return on their investment. Let me describe that in more details:
A. Assuming both chains would end up working out and on each a different Agoras based app would work then this would be like splitting the supply of the coins between two
application. ( I hope that the math is clear to all Wink

) .
B. On the other hand since assuming a failure to construct a rootchain is an option , the chances for such failure, having two active teams working on two different approaches
to this yet unresolved problem, just been reduced to half (I hope that this math is also clear to all Tongue

).
   C. I have great respect both for Ohad and HMC, I know both to be at the top of this game and to devote themselves for what they believe is the right way to achieve the same
   goal. However since both are yet to prove which is design is right. (maybe both would end up being complementary to each other) We as the investors are now put back in
   the position of gaining from the work of both teams despite the split and the distrust created along that fault line.

Interesting... I would be the first who support that approach if not that sentence from Ohad:

Quote

autonomic "project", is much less of a competitor, and much more of a vandalist enemy (specifically hmc's behind-the-back operations that didn't stop till nowadays). so take into account that 100k tokens are now allocated to them thanks to nili

so idk how that helps us

dmitryshech

Posts

Merits