Ninjastic
Home
Search
Users
Boards
Addresses
Ctrl + K
Toggle theme
Open menu
Overview
Merits
Notifications
JFC
ID: 927959
Forum Profile
Search Posts
Showing
09 Dec 2016
to
31 Aug 2025
7d
30d
120d
1y
All time
Posts
Showing posts
per month
Merits
Showing merits
per month
Most active boards
in period
09 Dec 2016
to
31 Aug 2025
Latest posts
View more
Showing 10 most recent posts
Re: Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Latest topics
Showing 3 most recent topics
Is this address format (e.g.: BTC.443860.3.56318) a good idea?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
What block size will be needed to support LN transactions at Visa volumes?
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin Tic-Tac Coopetition mining
8 years ago
Development & Technical Discussion