Quote from: ptdvz on November 10, 2018, 06:54:42 PM

Quote from: Kobayaya on November 10, 2018, 06:27:48 PM

I think you are smart enough to understand the situation, Conan will never come back.
Is better to use your knowledge and experience in more stable projects.

At least i can agree with you on the part that Conan doesn't come back. Sure, everything is possible but i'd be really surprised if he did and i also don't understand the personality cult about him.

"Better" is a very relative and subjective thing though. To me "better" is what i like doing Cheesy

Quote from: Drag0g0 on November 10, 2018, 06:47:17 PM

Quote from: ptdvz on November 10, 2018, 06:45:26 PM

Quote from: Drag0g0 on November 10, 2018, 06:37:28 PM

Crex24 allready did say that they move 1.3.1

Are you the one who posted this on discord too (sorry i forgot)? What's the source of that statement? No bad intentions. I am seriously interested.

Yes im, i did contact support, explain what happen, they have brain also, why would they wanna stay in 2.0?

I see. Let's hope they keep their word then.

Regarding staying with 2.0 or simply delisting: Well there could be several reasons. For one it could be simple policy to only act on developer input. Never underestimate the power and stupidity of bureaucracy... Also as i explained above a rollback leading to coins they are controlling disappearing seems like a very messy situation for them. At least it seems this way to me. Maybe they got this all figured out already. I really don't know.

Edit: Is anyone able to test if it's possible to deposit 1.3.1 coins? Crex24 site does not work for me.

Edit2: If it's possible to deposit 1.3.1 coins did they also remove the mass amount of fake 2.0.1 coins from circulation (ie. is a plausible amount of coins for sale)?

From my point of view a more clean way of dealing with it from a exchange point of view would be this (simple example to make a point, do not take the numbers literal):
exchange 1
- 1000000 - coins in current users balances (basically in the 2.x chain and includes fake coins, whatever)
- 10000 - coins in the exchange wallet after downgrade and resync the wallet from scratch (coins in the 1.x version)
- 1000000/10000 = 100 this is the value to which the balances need to be devided by
- user 1 balance 500 now -> will have 500/100=5 after downgrade

exchange 2 might be different
- 100000 - coins in current users balances (basically in the 2.x chain and includes fake coins, whatever)
- 50000 - coins in the exchange wallet after downgrade and resync the wallet from scratch (coins in the 1.x version)
- 1000000/50000 = 20 this is the value to which the balances need to be devided by
- user 2 balance 500 now -> will have 500/20=25 after downgrade

Is this fair to everyone?
Most likely not

Will everyone be happy with this approach?
Most probably not

Is it simple to implement?
Most probably yes as most exchanges have such possibility as it is more or less the same path used when there are swaps (swaps that need to be done in place without changing the ticket )

Is is a win - win or win - loose or loose - loose situation?
Most likely it is at the border between loose - loose and win - loose, but at least it does not loose the exchanges and does not make absolutely all coins worthless and without any exchanges

What do you gents think?

georgyous

Posts

Merits