Quote from: LOBSTER on January 02, 2015, 11:38:51 PM

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 02, 2015, 11:33:39 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on January 02, 2015, 11:27:38 PM

Quote from: dakota neat on January 02, 2015, 11:21:49 PM

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on January 02, 2015, 11:20:01 PM

Ok brothers I've read the sidechains whitepaper and I have a question.

What are the regulatory/political drawbacks or ramifications of introducing extra-anonymous features in a scBTC?

Nobody cares about the fucking goverment. This is Crypto.

Quote from: cypherdoc on January 02, 2015, 10:36:53 PM

Adam,

5. if a SC like Zerocoin/Zerocash gets declared illegal by the US gvt, legit pools that can't/won't participate in an illegal SC might have an actual incentive to attack it to destroy those users and their scBTC that are in fact using Zerocoin/Zerocash illegally. given that no SC will ever have 100% MM, 51% attacks become much easier to execute.

That doesn't sound very promising

Yes you are right. Not very promising and shady too!

Lobster my man, this was honestly the first thing that crossed my mind on reading the paper. I don't know why it isn't being addressed