Quote from: c-cex on January 03, 2015, 10:23:39 PM

Quote from: wtfdev on January 03, 2015, 10:08:41 PM

Quote from: chicken65 on January 03, 2015, 09:30:59 PM

Quote from: wtfdev on January 03, 2015, 09:12:08 PM

We developers get caught out to.
No one should feel bad about this. After all, like others I bought some of this my self based on the promise of a buy wall after ico end. Its truly shocking he edited his ann post and changed the meaning of the sentence. Such a shame because they give all us devs a bad name. Maybe Cex havent paid the developer yet and they could throw up the wall and let nature take its course?
I feel so sad for all those who invested. Shame... Sad

PS
Developer: if you are around you really need to speak to your investors. You really did (and still could have) a coin with much potential.

Hey good to see you here (under the circumstances).
Your a great dev, always engaging with your investors, and at least you havent vanished

Like you I bought some of this only because a buywall was promised.
Your coin is on cex as well. What they like to deal with?

Hi and thanks Cool

. I have been a little silent on the thread the last couple of weeks due to Xmas, family and so on but will be back on the case asap. We never had any problems with cex but our experience would be different as we didn't do an ico. Our communication with them has been limited. Speaking purely as an investor (not World Trade Funds) I am surprised they didn't at least freeze trading because of how obvious this scam was immediately after the ico ended. I do feel that is a worrying development in crypto if an exchange wont consider such obvious deceit as some kind of default situation.

We took responsibility to run ICO for MGT. They took our conditions. We both filled requirements for each other. We holded funds for 3 days after ICO ends. Finding no problem with mining, wallet and blockchain funds were released for MGT dev. We don't guarantee any promices given by dev. Our mission is to run wallets and make trading possible with best service we can give.

Anybody else seeing this? look at the disregard C-CEX representative has for its users.. 'our job is to run wallets and facilitate trading.. well if that's the case Why in the fuck are you also incharge of ICO"s We don't guarantee any promices given by dev .. that seems to be something that is totally out of your ball field doesn't it, damn straight its your responsibility to make sure the Developer isn't lying.. or do you mean as soon as you both agreed, and your payment of 2.5 bitcoins was agreed apon, you then disregarded your customers concerns?