Quote from: kupan787 on January 04, 2015, 06:11:21 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on January 04, 2015, 05:57:36 PM

Quote from: maildir on January 04, 2015, 05:47:21 PM

Quote from: millsdmb on January 04, 2015, 05:43:18 PM

Quote from: maildir on January 04, 2015, 05:25:42 PM

https://hashtalk.org/topic/16399/some-thoughts-on-merchant-adoption

requires a login??

Wasn't before, cute, they're having us provide all the links back to them then locking them up will they clean everything. How stupid is that since everything is archived anyway.

https://archive.today/1D4XK

I fear those original quotes have long since been scrubbed.

Wanna bet that archive.today owner is reading a poorly worded C&D letter right now?

Please save whatever you can on an encrypted flash drive. Never know what might come in handy.

Could any of this "shredding" be considered as destruction of evidence? Maybe that is a stretch, since they aren't a public company so the CEO isn't under the same level of scrutiny as a Public CEO. At best it seems morally reprehensible to state one thing to pump up your coin to your masses, and the scrub all evidence when the dump hits...

With that said, and you might have been joking, but what is the best way to be archiving this info? If we can't trust archive.today/archive.org, how can we save this data? Any way to scrape the content using CURL or the like, and save it locally? Or would it be best to create a shared google drive (or something) and store the content there?

Save Page As -> Webpage, Complete works quite well in Firefox or Chrome.

Image snapshots on sites like imgur are good too, it would be quite difficult to scrub those without some massive OCR effort.

Also what maildir says:

Quote from: maildir on January 04, 2015, 06:16:32 PM

There is a link to download the archive in .zip, next to where it says PIN THIS. Just download and save when ever you see an archive.today link.

I don't think there is going to be a lack of incriminating posts, it's more about their ability to weasel out of those claims. But deleting old posts looks like an indication of concern, to say the least.