Sure. And, of course, to you personally for my outrageous behavior. After all, I am insulting the nice person who gives anyone free money.

But for now, this is not the situation. Care to actually break the method of the artificially distant Ponzi operator and engage in a brief discussion? After all, I have absolutely no reason to act like this if it is all a big misunderstanding.

Let's keep it simple for starters. We could really use a hint as to why returns are so strongly dependent on the size of individual deposits, if not for the reason documented in the Currin Trading Ponzi (http://web.archive.org/web/20091026234156/http://geocities.com/currintrading/). This one also documented neatly why the operator rarely replies to garbage like this.

If time allows, I have one more enigma here: it is quite remarkable how relative fluctuations of deposits degraded over time, isn't it? Or has anyone heard of major series of forced withdrawals lately?

I think these should be valid questions, not just garbage. And, quite frankly, it's not like I am the only person who suspects a Ponzi here. If there is a satisfactory answer, it should help the overall reputation of BS&T quite a bit, independent of whether the question is garbage.