Quote from: Xell on January 05, 2015, 12:00:11 PM

Quote from: Derekman on January 05, 2015, 08:49:42 AM

I HAVE a personal judgment against Mohamed Akram and against AT so i intend to summon him to court to explain where the money is if i don't get anything out of him.

If this is actually the case, then he has an extremely strong defence - in that he didn't personally deal with you and therefore isn't personally liable for the debt. That's the whole point of a limited company. You're wasting your time pursuing individuals in court because the law is on their side, and one way or another you will end up footing the bill both in legal costs and your own time will be wasted.

I'm sorry but you are wrong. He already HAS A PERSONAL JUDGEMENT. A judge has ruled Mubasher is personally liable. This isn't a complex lawsuit, its a small claim. As I have pointed out before Mubasher made personal assurances in his many newsletters and forum posts (https://alpha-t.net/news/). They were signed MOHAMMAD MUBASHER AKRAM this gives him personal contact. He has also made numerous statements and claims in the media (http://www.coindesk.com/uncertainty-builds-alpha-technology-misses-another-shipping-deadline/), these make him personally liable if the company commits a criminal act.

Very similar to this case http://www.rutherfordslegal.com/news/sue-behind-the-corporate-ve?page=5

Quote

The Court will only consider piercing the corporate veil where there is (1) control of the company by the 'wrongdoer' and (2) impropriety, that is the use of the company as a device or façade to conceal the wrongdoing: Hashem v Shayif & Radfan Ltd [2008].

Quote

In this particular case our client had paid a substantial deposit for a second hand commercial tractor but the vehicle was not delivered nor was the deposit returned. The defendant said that the transaction was with a limited company which was in the process of being wound up. We disagreed as our client had been dealing with the director personally as well as the company.

Alpha is a one man band. Any communication you have with them is directly with Mubasher Akram. The company structure does not exist, there are no other employees just Mubasher Akram and he has made promises to his customers that he has failed to deliver. He has refused to refund deposits and has cancelled orders without consent. He has broken the law and is personally liable, the company is a facade. A Judge has already ruled on this and struck out his defence. Its a done deal.

Derekman HAS A PERSONAL JUDGEMENT, now he just needs to enforce it. I know of a couple of other customers who have also received personal judgements against Mubasher and are now seeking enforcement/have been enforced and are awaiting payment. This isn't rocket science, but if you are just about to start now, you may already be too late.